Do we need a Mr Tests?
Francois Gouget
fgouget at free.fr
Fri Oct 4 19:02:49 CDT 2019
I'm concerned by some of the recent events regarding WineTest:
* A couple of times compilation of the official binaries broke. This got
caught within a couple of days which is okayish.
* But the winehq.org upgrade completely broke test.winehq.org and it
took 10 days for anyone to notice!
* Then there's the wininet:ftp, wininet:http & co breakage, also caused
by the winehq.org upgrade. This time it took a whopping 24 days for
anyone to notice!
https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2019-October/151834.html
* There's also TestBot VMs that have almost completely stopped
succeeding at posting WineTest results: vista, vistau64*, w8*, w864.
I'm probably more to blame for this than anyone else but I would have
expected someone to publicly wonder what's going on with these VMs.
* Finally there's the gdi32:bitmap not-quite regression. I may have
missed something but I did not see it mentioned before.
https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2019-October/152082.html
My sinking feeling is:
* Nobody looks at test.winehq.org.
* Major WineTest regressions can sail through without anyone noticing.
My feeling is that nobody feels responsible for making sure
test.winehq.org works and for spotting regressions.
Hence why I think we may need someone whose responsibility would be to
monitor test.winehq.org, analyze the WineTest results, diagnose new
issues and report them.
I did something like that a few times but it takes quite a bit of time
so I had to stop. Essentially it went something like this:
* Every couple of weeks, open the results for the latest build:
https://test.winehq.org/data/7d954f23356f0aaf49b1ef0c4bed83041cb41c08/
* For each line that has a failure on Windows, open the corresponding
test page. For instance:
https://test.winehq.org/data/tests/advapi32:service.html
* If the tests start failing consistenly on a specific date on at least
one platform, dig in to figure out why.
For instance:
https://test.winehq.org/data/tests/gdi32:bitmap.html
https://test.winehq.org/data/tests/wininet:http.html
* Likewise, if a test has been consistently getting 13 failures on a
platform and now consistently gets 19 it may be because a commit
introduced new failures.
For instance:
https://test.winehq.org/data/tests/advapi32:service.html
This requires regular checks otherwise failure is the new normal and
there is nothing to see.
--
Francois Gouget <fgouget at free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/
A black hole is just God dividing by zero.
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list