[WINEHQ] Assorted spelling fixes
Francois Gouget
fgouget at free.fr
Tue Jul 5 08:29:29 CDT 2005
Changelog:
* templates/en/status_todo.template
wwn/wn20020509_122.xml
wwn/wn20021129_146.xml
wwn/wn20031024_193.xml
wwn/wn20040203_208.xml
wwn/wn20041022_245.xml
wwn/wn20050624_280.xml
wwn/wn20050701_281.xml
Assorted spelling fixes
--
Francois Gouget fgouget at free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/
Good judgment comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgment
-- Barry LePatner
-------------- next part --------------
Index: templates/en/status_todo.template
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/lostwages/templates/en/status_todo.template,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -p -r1.16 status_todo.template
--- templates/en/status_todo.template 1 Jun 2005 19:08:24 -0000 1.16
+++ templates/en/status_todo.template 20 Jun 2005 11:57:06 -0000
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Regedit]
* Allow display and editing of binary (REG_BINARY) values.
* Allow display and editing of multi-string (REG_SZ_MULTI) values.
- * Import registry files regerated by Windows 2000 regedit.
+ * Import registry files generated by Windows 2000 regedit.
[winecfg]
Index: wwn/wn20020509_122.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20020509_122.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.11 wn20020509_122.xml
--- wwn/wn20020509_122.xml 20 Jun 2005 16:21:07 -0000 1.11
+++ wwn/wn20020509_122.xml 5 Jul 2005 12:36:01 -0000
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ Mentioned in the patch is:
** an uninitialized stack variable could cause this to fail.<br />
** This is fixed in version 1.5, which seems to correspond to <br />
** Xfree >= 4.2<br />
- ** In the mean time, we do a total kludge to attempt to address this:<br />
+ ** In the meantime, we do a total kludge to attempt to address this:<br />
** we call it twice, and pray that the second time it is<br />
** initialized (and nudge the stack while we're at it). <br />
** If it doesn't, we just bail.
Index: wwn/wn20021129_146.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20021129_146.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 wn20021129_146.xml
--- wwn/wn20021129_146.xml 16 Dec 2003 17:09:27 -0000 1.7
+++ wwn/wn20021129_146.xml 5 Jul 2005 12:36:20 -0000
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ Dimi Paun wrote,
However can't yet see whether its going to do anything as in order to
actually run programs it looks like we need tolink miscemu/main.c
Problem here being that it wants to link with ntdll, which doesn't build
- yet. That still needs a lot more work... In the mean time a very simple
+ yet. That still needs a lot more work... In the meantime a very simple
patch that does nothing for context_i386.c is below in case anyone else
wants to try...</quote></p>
Index: wwn/wn20031024_193.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20031024_193.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.3 wn20031024_193.xml
--- wwn/wn20031024_193.xml 16 Dec 2003 17:09:27 -0000 1.3
+++ wwn/wn20031024_193.xml 5 Jul 2005 12:36:31 -0000
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ Leo Murray-Smith explained why it would
<quote who="Ivan Leo Murray-Smith"><p>
Most normal people (Users) don't want to edit config files or use a shell.
That's why most people don't use linux. Winecfg isn't complete, winesetuptk will
-go soon, but in the mean time it's the best way to configure wine. I get emails
+go soon, but in the meantime it's the best way to configure wine. I get emails
all the time from people thanking me for putting winesetuptk on sourceforge,
it's had a lot of downloads, and I don't think we can remove it yet. As soon as
winecfg is ready, I'll hide winesetuptk (That won't work anyway because wine
Index: wwn/wn20040203_208.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20040203_208.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 wn20040203_208.xml
--- wwn/wn20040203_208.xml 20 Jun 2005 16:21:07 -0000 1.4
+++ wwn/wn20040203_208.xml 5 Jul 2005 12:37:43 -0000
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ within the next few months.
</p><p>...</p><p>
Day one ended wrapped up at about 4:30. Jeremy White invited everyone to
-dinner at the Mall of America. In the mean time Michael Stefaniuc,
+dinner at the Mall of America. In the meantime Michael Stefaniuc,
Dimi Paun, Marcus Meissner, Shachar Shemesh, and I decided to visit
the Ice Palace - a big event in Saint Paul. Unbeknownst to us, this
attraction seemed to draw the entire population of Minnesota.
Index: wwn/wn20041022_245.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20041022_245.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 wn20041022_245.xml
--- wwn/wn20041022_245.xml 10 Nov 2004 00:23:31 -0000 1.2
+++ wwn/wn20041022_245.xml 5 Jul 2005 12:37:33 -0000
@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ GDB behaves the same (it shows the line
watch).</quote> </p>
<p>Eric didn't send his fix to wine-patches and he alluded that it was
-part of a bigger patch. In the mean time, you can find the
+part of a bigger patch. In the meantime, you can find the
<a href="http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2004/10/att-0435/01-wdbg5.diff">watchpoints
patch</a> in the wine-devel archives.</p>
Index: wwn/wn20050624_280.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20050624_280.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 wn20050624_280.xml
--- wwn/wn20050624_280.xml 24 Jun 2005 03:40:37 -0000 1.2
+++ wwn/wn20050624_280.xml 5 Jul 2005 11:56:05 -0000
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ I've looked into using a Balanced Tree D
interface to the registry. I think it would be a good solution, but
the question is whether or not you want the overhead of another library
added to wine. That's why I'm writing here actually - I need to know
-if it's ok to add this dependancy to wine, or if I should find a different
+if it's ok to add this dependency to wine, or if I should find a different
approach.
</p><p>
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ registry format. This way you could use
and can read and update registry piecewise. It's organized like a
little file system - or database if you want to see it this way. It's
not documented. But you could have a look at the ReactOS
-implementation, which claimes to be compatible to NT4.
+implementation, which claims to be compatible with NT4.
</quote></p>
<p>James Liggett looked into it and reported,
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ to work only for keys rooted at the conf
</p><p>
My question is: Am I doomed to implement the caching on my own for this key,
should I generalize the helper functions, or do you think this configuration
-option should'nt be in winecfg at all?</p></quote>
+option shouldn't be in winecfg at all?</p></quote>
<p>Mike Hearn wondered when a user <i>wouldn't</i> want that to be
set up. Michael described why it should be configurable:</p>
@@ -575,9 +575,9 @@ could tackle that might prove to be inte
I have another 'fun' and useful project to add to
the list.
</p><p>
-It should be fairly to make wined3d (or d3d8) use the
+It should be fairly easy to make wined3d (or d3d8) use the
wgl (windows opengl) instead of glx. (just search for
-glx commands and replace then with the wgl
+glx commands and replace them with the wgl
equivalents)
</p><p>
Doing so would enable Wine's d3d to run on windows in
Index: wwn/wn20050701_281.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20050701_281.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 wn20050701_281.xml
--- wwn/wn20050701_281.xml 1 Jul 2005 15:48:42 -0000 1.1
+++ wwn/wn20050701_281.xml 5 Jul 2005 12:42:36 -0000
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ market through the use of CrossOver tech
mailing list concerning this. All in all this is pretty exciting and it
offers a lot of interesting possibilities for Wine and CodeWeavers.</p>
-<p>Tom Wickline has gone through and update Wine's
+<p>Tom Wickline has gone through and updated Wine's
<a href="http://www.winehq.com/site/status">status pages</a> to reflect
work that's been done over the past six months. As usual, these are rough
estimates of how well things are implemented. If you look at the
@@ -176,14 +176,14 @@ and those entries still get read into th
<tt>HKLM\Software\Wine\Wine\Config</tt>
branch. However, those entries are dead. All of the real Wine settings
have been migrated elsewhere in the registry. To configure Wine, your first
-stop should be to check out <tt>winecfg</tt> program to see if it can make a
+stop should be to check out the <tt>winecfg</tt> program to see if it can make a
change in the registry for you. If you feel like changing registry
settings using <tt>regedit</tt>, you should first look in
<tt>HKCU\Software\Wine </tt>
since many settings have been migrated there. </p>
<p>The next work to be done in this area will remove the actual code
-that reads the config file. In the mean time, if you have a config file
+that reads the config file. In the meantime, if you have a config file
you'll want to archive the settings somewhere and then ditch it.</p>
</section>
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ concerning a Mac port:</p>
of CrossOver make business sense...until now.
</p><p>
We're still figuring out just how we want to attack this,
- and so on (and waiting for our dev kit to arrive &lt;g&gt;
+ and so on (and waiting for our dev kit to arrive &lt;g&gt;)
Right now, we're trying to encourage
ISVs to partner with us; the more interest we can generate
now, the more energy we can put into this prior to the
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ should be back to the old behaviour:
This will also help you to figure out if a problem is due to unixfs. If you do
'regsvr32 shell32' again, the key will be re-created.</p></quote>
-<p>Dimi wondered why registring it was necessary,
+<p>Dimi wondered why registering it was necessary,
<quote who="Dimitrie Paun">
This is fantastic! Way to go Michael, you've nailed an important
integration issue. BTW, if it is registered by default, why do we
@@ -308,21 +308,21 @@ The reward is, like most of Wine code, t
Let me know if you're interested.
</p></quote>
-<p>Jacek described some more detail about how to tackle it:</p>
+<p>Jacek described some more details about how to tackle it:</p>
<quote who="Jacek Caban"><p>
I think it will be great to have it done. I'd like to
point out one thing for the way to implement it:
the most important is to have it working with
native shdocvw.dll and mshtml.dll. It won't work
-with built in in the current state of them, but it
+with builtin in their current state, but it
will be fixed soon and I believe it can be in CVS
even if it doesn't work without these dlls.
While implementing then we shouldn't pay too much
attention to get it working with Mozilla ActiveX
Control - it will never work perfectly and I hope
to get rid of its dependency soon. Of course you
-may do it working, but, as my tests show, it's
+may get it working, but, as my tests show, it's
far from compatible with MS. Also, we need to
use itss.dll, which is impossible with Mozilla ActiveX
(I'm not sure if Mozilla has support for chm protocol,
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ http://66.93.236.84/~jedwin/projects/chm
that Mike used in itss to decompress chm.
</p><p>
As a conclusion: it would be really good to have
-this working in Wine. It uses most of IE related API
+this working in Wine. It uses most of IE's related API
(I didn't mention URLMoniker here, which also needs
some work) and getting it to work out of box will be
a great test for Wine.
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ int WINAPI WinMain(HINSTANCE hInst, HINS
<topic>Project Management</topic>
<p>Jeremy White announced the status of Google's Summer of Code.
We still haven't seen the details yet or who will be working with
-Wine. In the mean time, Jeremy outlined the process they went
+Wine. In the meantime, Jeremy outlined the process they went
through:</p>
<quote who="Jeremy White"><p>
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ I think Google jumped into this without
prepared as you might otherwise hope, and there
have been challenges in figuring this all out.
(We're still largely clueless about the responsibilities
-of mentors from Googles perspective, for example).
+of mentors from Google's perspective, for example).
</p><p>
So, thanks to everyone that submitted a proposal.
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static void initialize() {
// _mmap = dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "mmap");</code></ul>
}</code></ul></p><p>
-Finally it is the printf who does the magic and not the wrapped mmap! The
+Finally it is the printf which does the magic and not the wrapped mmap! The
above example also worked for me. Can we still solve this problem with
logic?
</p></quote>
More information about the wine-patches
mailing list