10 Mar
2018
10 Mar
'18
7:23 a.m.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44699
Bug ID: 44699
Summary: Clang 6.0 fails to run under wine
Product: Wine
Version: 3.0
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: advapi32
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: martellmalone(a)gmail.com
Distribution: ---
This is the current output when running clang under wine.
```
fixme:file:FindFirstFileExW flags not implemented 0x00000002
fixme:file:FindFirstFileExW flags not implemented 0x00000002
fixme:file:FindFirstFileExW flags not implemented 0x00000002
fixme:file:FindFirstFileExW flags not implemented 0x00000002
fixme:crypt:CRYPT_LoadProvider Failed to load dll
L"C:\\windows\\system32\\rsaenh.dll"
LLVM ERROR: Could not acquire a cryptographic context: Unknown error
(0x8009001D)
```
Here is the line it currently fails on.
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/release_60/lib/Support/Windows/Pro…
This could be possibly related to #44061
To reproduce this you can run the following docker build script which build
llvm and clang and then cross compiles it for windows with mingw-w64.
Executing the resulting clang on a simple c source file results in the error.
https://github.com/martell/mingw-w64-clang/blob/master/Dockerfile
This is an x64 application.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
10 Mar
10 Mar
7:26 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 44699] Clang 6.0 fails to run under wine
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44699
Martell <martellmalone(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.winehq.org/sho
| |w_bug.cgi?id=44061
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
8:48 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 44699] Clang 6.0 fails to run under wine
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44699
Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |austinenglish(a)gmail.com
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
9:13 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 44699] Clang 6.0 fails to run under wine
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44699
--- Comment #1 from Martell <martellmalone(a)gmail.com> ---
Copied the tool-chain across onto a windows 10 box and it ran fine.
Looks like this is most likely a wine bug.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
10:38 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 44699] Clang 6.0 fails to run under wine
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44699
--- Comment #2 from Martell <martellmalone(a)gmail.com> ---
The call stack from calling CryptAcquireContextW
0009:Call
advapi32.CryptAcquireContextW(0112c8a0,00000000,00000000,00000001,f0000000)
ret=141781bd4
0009:Call ntdll.RtlInitUnicodeString(0112c4f8,7fd6f153a0a0
L"Software\\Microsoft\\Cryptography") ret=7fd6f151038d
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlInitUnicodeString() retval=00000040 ret=7fd6f151038d
0009:Call ntdll.NtOpenKeyEx(0112c690,000f003f,0112c508,00000000)
ret=7fd6f150e34a
[0m[91m0009:Ret ntdll.NtOpenKeyEx() retval=c0000034 ret=7fd6f150e34a
0009:Call ntdll.RtlNtStatusToDosError(c0000034) ret=7fd6f15103a1
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlNtStatusToDosError() retval=00000002 ret=7fd6f15103a1
0009:Call KERNEL32.LocalAlloc(00000040,00000064) ret=7fd6f14ffe54
0009:Call ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap(00010000,00000008,00000064) ret=7b453b54
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap() retval=000381b0 ret=7b453b54
0009:Ret KERNEL32.LocalAlloc() retval=000381b0 ret=7fd6f14ffe54
0009:Call ntdll.RtlInitUnicodeString(0112c4b8,000381b0
L"Software\\Microsoft\\Cryptography\\Provider Type 001") ret=7fd6f151038d
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlInitUnicodeString() retval=00000064 ret=7fd6f151038d
0009:Call ntdll.NtOpenKeyEx(0112c690,02000000,0112c4c8,00000000)
ret=7fd6f150e34a
0009:Ret ntdll.NtOpenKeyEx() retval=c0000034 ret=7fd6f150e34a
0009:Call ntdll.RtlNtStatusToDosError(c0000034) ret=7fd6f15103a1
[0m[91m0009:Ret ntdll.RtlNtStatusToDosError() retval=00000002
ret=7fd6f15103a1
0009:Call KERNEL32.LocalFree(000381b0) ret=7fd6f1500501
0009:Call ntdll.RtlLockHeap(00010000) ret=7b4544b0
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlLockHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b4544b0
0009:Call ntdll.RtlFreeHeap(00010000,00000001,000381b0) ret=7b453b67
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlFreeHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b453b67
0009:Call ntdll.RtlUnlockHeap(00010000) ret=7b454620
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlUnlockHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b454620
0009:Ret KERNEL32.LocalFree() retval=00000000 ret=7fd6f1500501
0009:Call KERNEL32.LocalAlloc(00000040,00000082) ret=7fd6f14ffe54
0009:Call ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap(00010000,00000008,00000082) ret=7b453b54
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap() retval=000381b0 ret=7b453b54
0009:Ret KERNEL32.LocalAlloc() retval=000381b0 ret=7fd6f14ffe54
0009:Call ntdll.RtlInitUnicodeString(0112c4b8,000381b0
L"Software\\Microsoft\\Cryptography\\Defaults\\Provider Types\\Type 001")
ret=7fd6f151038d
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlInitUnicodeString() retval=00000082 ret=7fd6f151038d
0009:Call ntdll.NtOpenKeyEx(0112c690,02000000,0112c4c8,00000000)
ret=7fd6f150e34a
[0m[91m0009:Ret ntdll.NtOpenKeyEx() retval=c0000034 ret=7fd6f150e34a
0009:Call ntdll.RtlNtStatusToDosError(c0000034) ret=7fd6f15103a1
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlNtStatusToDosError() retval=00000002 ret=7fd6f15103a1
0009:Call KERNEL32.LocalFree(000381b0) ret=7fd6f15005b0
0009:Call ntdll.RtlLockHeap(00010000) ret=7b4544b0
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlLockHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b4544b0
0009:Call ntdll.RtlFreeHeap(00010000,00000001,000381b0) ret=7b453b67
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlFreeHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b453b67
0009:Call ntdll.RtlUnlockHeap(00010000) ret=7b454620
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlUnlockHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b454620
0009:Ret KERNEL32.LocalFree() retval=00000000 ret=7fd6f15005b0
0009:Call KERNEL32.LocalFree(00000000) ret=7fd6f1500e87
0009:Call ntdll.RtlLockHeap(00010000) ret=7b4544b0
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlLockHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b4544b0
0009:Call ntdll.RtlFreeHeap(00010000,00000001,00000000) ret=7b453b67
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlFreeHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b453b67
0009:Call ntdll.RtlUnlockHeap(00010000) ret=7b454620
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlUnlockHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b454620
0009:Ret KERNEL32.LocalFree() retval=00000000 ret=7fd6f1500e87
0009:Call KERNEL32.LocalFree(00000000) ret=7fd6f1500e91
0009:Call ntdll.RtlLockHeap(00010000) ret=7b4544b0
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlLockHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b4544b0
0009:Call ntdll.RtlFreeHeap(00010000,00000001,00000000) ret=7b453b67
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlFreeHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b453b67
[0m[91m0009:Call ntdll.RtlUnlockHeap(00010000) ret=7b454620
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlUnlockHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b454620
0009:Ret KERNEL32.LocalFree() retval=00000000 ret=7fd6f1500e91
0009:Call KERNEL32.LocalFree(00000000) ret=7fd6f1500e99
0009:Call ntdll.RtlLockHeap(00010000) ret=7b4544b0
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlLockHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b4544b0
0009:Call ntdll.RtlFreeHeap(00010000,00000001,00000000) ret=7b453b67
[0m[91m0009:Ret ntdll.RtlFreeHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b453b67
0009:Call ntdll.RtlUnlockHeap(00010000) ret=7b454620
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlUnlockHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b454620
0009:Ret KERNEL32.LocalFree() retval=00000000 ret=7fd6f1500e99
0009:Call KERNEL32.LocalFree(00000000) ret=7fd6f1500ea1
0009:Call ntdll.RtlLockHeap(00010000) ret=7b4544b0
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlLockHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b4544b0
0009:Call ntdll.RtlFreeHeap(00010000,00000001,00000000) ret=7b453b67
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlFreeHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b453b67
0009:Call ntdll.RtlUnlockHeap(00010000) ret=7b454620
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlUnlockHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b454620
0009:Ret KERNEL32.LocalFree() retval=00000000 ret=7fd6f1500ea1
0009:Call KERNEL32.LocalFree(00000000) ret=7fd6f1500ea9
0009:Call ntdll.RtlLockHeap(00010000) ret=7b4544b0
[0m[91m0009:Ret ntdll.RtlLockHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b4544b0
0009:Call ntdll.RtlFreeHeap(00010000,00000001,00000000) ret=7b453b67
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlFreeHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b453b67
0009:Call ntdll.RtlUnlockHeap(00010000) ret=7b454620
0009:Ret ntdll.RtlUnlockHeap() retval=00000001 ret=7b454620
0009:Ret KERNEL32.LocalFree() retval=00000000 ret=7fd6f1500ea9
0009:Ret advapi32.CryptAcquireContextW() retval=00000000 ret=141781bd4
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
11:09 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 44699] Clang 6.0 fails to run under wine
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44699
--- Comment #3 from Martell <martellmalone(a)gmail.com> ---
I was able to reproduce with this minimal example
```
#include <stdio.h>
#include <windows.h>
#include <wincrypt.h>
// -ladvapi32
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
HCRYPTPROV provider;
if (!CryptAcquireContextW(&provider, NULL, NULL, PROV_RSA_FULL,
CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT)) {
printf("failed world\n");
return -1;
}
printf("successful world\n");
return 0;
}
```
I'm wondering if this could have anything to do with my host?
I am running this under alpine linux which uses musl libc.
https://github.com/alpinelinux/aports/blob/master/community/wine/APKBUILD
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
11:18 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 44699] Clang 6.0 fails to run under wine
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44699
--- Comment #4 from Martell <martellmalone(a)gmail.com> ---
Created attachment 60716
--> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=60716
CryptAcquireContextW PROV_RSA_FULL CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT TEST
```
#include <stdio.h>
#include <windows.h>
#include <wincrypt.h>
// -ladvapi32
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
HCRYPTPROV provider;
if (!CryptAcquireContextW(&provider, NULL, NULL, PROV_RSA_FULL,
CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT)) {
printf("failed world\n");
return -1;
}
printf("successful world\n");
return 0;
}
compiled with `x86_64-w64-mingw32-clang test-crypto.c -o
test-crypto-c-x86_64.exe -ladvapi32`
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
23 Mar
23 Mar
2:11 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 44699] Clang 6.0 fails to run under wine
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44699
Mateusz Mikuła <mati865(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mati865(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Mateusz Mikuła <mati865(a)gmail.com> ---
Patch from https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41703#c28 solves the issue.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
17 Dec
17 Dec
5:03 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 44699] Clang 6.0 fails to run under wine
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44699
Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |download, source
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
7 Apr
7 Apr
12:56 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 44699] Clang 6.0 fails to run under wine
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44699
temp82(a)luukku.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |temp82(a)luukku.com
--- Comment #6 from temp82(a)luukku.com ---
(In reply to Mateusz Mikuła from comment #5)
Patch from
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41703#c28 solves the
issue.
that bug is now marked fixed, is this fixed too?
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
18 Apr
18 Apr
6:14 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 44699] Clang 6.0 fails to run under wine
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44699
--- Comment #7 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> ---
The Dockerfile doesn't work here (granted, it's 6 years old; I suspect that
some git references weren't pinned, but didn't look much further).
i686-w64-mingw32-clang -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -m32 -masm=att -D__LIBMSVCRT__
-I../include "-I/include" -pipe -std=gnu99 -D_CRTBLD -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x0f00
-D__MSVCRT_VERSION__=0x700 -D__USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO=0 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat
-Wstrict-aliasing -Wshadow -Wpacked -Winline -Wimplicit-function-declaration
-Wmissing-noreturn -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -MT
misc/lib32_libcrtdll_extra_a-imaxabs.o -MD -MP -MF
misc/.deps/lib32_libcrtdll_extra_a-imaxabs.Tpo -c -o
misc/lib32_libcrtdll_extra_a-imaxabs.o `test -f 'misc/imaxabs.c' || echo
'../'`misc/imaxabs.c
../misc/imaxabs.c:24:27: error: definition 'llabs' cannot also be an alias
long long __attribute__ ((alias ("imaxabs"))) __cdecl llabs (long long);
^
../misc/imaxabs.c:27:25: error: definition '_abs64' cannot also be an alias
__int64 __attribute__ ((alias ("imaxabs"))) __cdecl _abs64 (__int64);
^
2 errors generated.
make[1]: *** [Makefile:28425: misc/lib32_libcrtdll_extra_a-imaxabs.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/mingw-w64/mingw-w64-crt/build-i686'
make: *** [Makefile:13979: all] Error 2
The command '/bin/sh -c ./build-mingw-w64.sh $TOOLCHAIN_PREFIX
$TOOLCHAIN_ARCHS' returned a non-zero code: 2
$ docker --version
Docker version 20.10.25+dfsg1, build b82b9f3
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
1:57 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 44699] Clang 6.0 fails to run under wine
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44699
Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |testcase
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
19 Apr
19 Apr
6:39 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 44699] Clang 6.0 fails to run under wine
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44699
Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> ---
I tried using the prebuilt binary from upstream:
https://releases.llvm.org/6.0.0/LLVM-6.0.0-win64.exe
(In reply to Martell from comment #4)
Created attachment 60716 [details]
CryptAcquireContextW PROV_RSA_FULL CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT TEST
```
#include <stdio.h>
#include <windows.h>
#include <wincrypt.h>
// -ladvapi32
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
HCRYPTPROV provider;
if (!CryptAcquireContextW(&provider, NULL, NULL, PROV_RSA_FULL,
CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT)) {
printf("failed world\n");
return -1;
}
printf("successful world\n");
return 0;
}
compiled with `x86_64-w64-mingw32-clang test-crypto.c -o
test-crypto-c-x86_64.exe -ladvapi32`
I apparently missed the binary.
Yes, this is fixed:
austin@debian:~/Downloads$ /opt/oldwow64/wine-5.6/bin/wine
test-crypto-c-x86_64.exe
000b:err:seh:setup_exception stack overflow 1856 bytes in thread 000b eip
000000007bcafe18 esp 0000000000130ed0 stack 0x130000-0x132000-0x230000
000f:err:seh:setup_exception stack overflow 1856 bytes in thread 000f eip
000000007bcafe18 esp 0000000000130ed0 stack 0x130000-0x132000-0x230000
failed world
austin@debian:~/Downloads$ /opt/oldwow64/wine-6.0/bin/wine
test-crypto-c-x86_64.exe
successful world
I'll leave it to someone else to bisect the actual fix, if they have
time/interest.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
8:23 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 44699] Clang 6.0 fails to run under wine
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44699
Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> ---
Closing bugs fixed in 9.7.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
14
days inactive
2246
days old
13 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org -
WineHQ Bugzilla