https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49854 --- Comment #2 from Todd Chester <ToddAndMargo(a)zoho.com> --- Mine was running AppMngr.exe from the install of https://cdn.watchguard.com/SoftwareCenter/Files/WSM/12_6_2_U1/wsm_12_6_2_U1… err:module:import_dll Library WLDAP32.dll (which is needed by L"C:\\Program Files\\WatchGuard\\wsm11\\wsm/bin\\wgsvc.dll") not found The problem is all over google. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49854 Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|-unknown |ntdll --- Comment #4 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- Do you have any DLL overrides in place? Even when importing I see the following message: 00e8:err:module:open_builtin_file failed to load .so lib "/bridge/git/wine32/dlls/wldap32/wldap32.dll.so" 00e8:err:module:import_dll Loading library wldap32.dll (which is needed by L"Z:\\bridge\\git\\wine32\\dlls\\wldap32\\tests\\wldap32_test.exe") failed (error c000007a). 00e8:err:module:LdrInitializeThunk Importing dlls for L"Z:\\bridge\\git\\wine32\\dlls\\wldap32\\tests\\wldap32_test.exe" failed, status c0000135 Can you please attach a log with WINEDEBUG=+module,+loaddll? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49854 --- Comment #6 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- Is there a (lowercase!) wldap32.dll.so present on your system? The error message should only occur if wldap32.dll.so is missing. I don't know why a fake wldap32.dll would be present if wldap32.dll.so is missing, but I can't figure out any other way to explain the log contents. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49854 --- Comment #8 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- Actually, I should ask, is there a *32-bit* wldap32.dll.so? For that matter, is there a 32-bit fake wldap32.dll present in C:\windows\syswow64? Can you please give the exact paths to both if so? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49854 --- Comment #10 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- Is this a 32-bit-only prefix? (Is there a C:\windows\syswow64 directory alongside C:\windows\system32?) If so, it is more than a little strange that wldap32.dll is missing from C:\windows\syswow64, and that would explain why you receive a "not found" error message. In that case, does the error message persist after running `wineboot -u`, or creating a clean prefix? If not, I'm even more confused; I can't easily figure out how STATUS_DLL_NOT_FOUND can result from a setup that has not been tampered with in some way. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49854 --- Comment #12 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- Well, that wasn't particularly an answer to my question, but after inspecting the Fedora package source for wine, I think I see the problem. Granted, this is a bit of guessing on my part (answering the questions above would help confirm, and also knowing whether /usr/lib/wine/wldap32.dll.so is present if wine-ldap.i686 is missing), but: Fedora breaks off several pieces of the wine package, which themselves require dependencies. Specifically, it makes the Unix libraries (*.dll.so) part of those packages rather than the core "wine" package. wine-ldap is an example of such. The problem, for you, was that wldap32.dll.so *was* missing. This wasn't obvious because there are two instances of wldap32.dll.so, one for each architecture, and you had the 64-bit wine-ldap package already installed; hence an instance of wldap32.dll.so did exist on your computer, but for the wrong architecture. On the Wine side, the easiest thing to do is probably explicitly print the architecture when a library is missing. On the Fedora side, I really have to wonder why they're shipping parts of Wine separately like this. Presumably they're optional dependencies, but then, why not just cut out the middleman? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49854 --- Comment #14 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> --- (In reply to Austin English from comment #13) No, OpenLDAP is now built as a PE library. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49854 Gijs Vermeulen <gijsvrm(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED Resolution|NOTOURBUG |INVALID --- Comment #16 from Gijs Vermeulen <gijsvrm(a)gmail.com> --- Closing. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.