http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35963 --- Comment #1 from farmboy0+winehq(a)googlemail.com --- Created attachment 48061 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48061 backtrace #2 from wine -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35963 --- Comment #3 from farmboy0+winehq(a)googlemail.com --- Created attachment 48072 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48072 full log with mesa debug output for backtrace #1 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35963 --- Comment #5 from farmboy0+winehq(a)googlemail.com --- I am using * Mesa git * Radeon SI open source driver git * Kernel 3.14 * X.org server 1.15 My graphics card is an AMD Radeon HD 7750 (Cape Verde) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35963 Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|-unknown |directx-d3d -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35963 --- Comment #7 from farmboy0+winehq(a)googlemail.com --- Created attachment 48102 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48102 patch v2 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35963 --- Comment #9 from farmboy0+winehq(a)googlemail.com --- %f prints the value as -nan so you are correct. but both the directx manual and the opengl spec define the values as >= 0, so the check should be correct. There is a bug in mesa however as the glLight function is supposed to return GL_INVALID_VALUE on negative values of ATTENUATION. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35963 --- Comment #11 from farmboy0+winehq(a)googlemail.com --- (In reply to Henri Verbeet from comment #10) No it shouldnt. the GL manual says it should return an GL_INVALID_VALUE which would still be an error in wine but probably with lesser consequences. The comments in the wine code even state not to accept all the BS windows apps set as attenuation values. Yes the assertion causes the error. I will file a bug in mesa for that. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35963 --- Comment #13 from farmboy0+winehq(a)googlemail.com --- After some more research I have come to the conclusion that the mesa implementation is in accordance with the OpenGL 2.1 spec. (http://www.opengl.org/sdk/docs/man2/xhtml/glLight.xml) The spec says: GL_CONSTANT_ATTENUATION GL_LINEAR_ATTENUATION GL_QUADRATIC_ATTENUATION params is a single integer or floating-point value that specifies one of the three light attenuation factors. Integer and floating-point values are mapped directly. **Only nonnegative values are accepted.** etc.. It also says: GL_INVALID_VALUE is generated ... if a negative attenuation factor is specified. NaN is neither nonnegative nor negative thus it is neither accepted nor is an error generated which is exactly what Mesa does. This means that it is wine's responsibility to reject NaN values. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35963 winetest(a)luukku.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |winetest(a)luukku.com --- Comment #15 from winetest(a)luukku.com --- This game is available for free for limited time from origin. https://www.origin.com/fin/fi-fi/store/free-games -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35963 Sergey Isakov <isakov-sl(a)bk.ru> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |isakov-sl(a)bk.ru --- Comment #17 from Sergey Isakov <isakov-sl(a)bk.ru> --- (In reply to joaopa from comment #16) I can't check the game behaviour under Mesa but the claim "This means that it is wine's responsibility to reject NaN values." is still not corrected. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.