Virtual memory under Win95

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Ulrich Weigand" <weigand at immd1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:

> VirtualQuery in Win95, however, appears to completely ignore the 
> KERNEL32 list of views, but always calls the _PageQuery VMM service
> and returns VMM's opinion on the status of the pages.  This explains
> why VirtualQuery shows the pages still present after UnmapViewOfFile.

Perhaps applications which use assumptions about Win95 virtual memory
management should be considered as broken? Or it is worth to support them?

In my case installer works very well with -winver nt40 switch, but certainly
there are other applications written for Win9x in mind only...