Dr. Seuss, licensing, and WINE
Dimitrie O. Paun
dimi at cs.toronto.edu
Fri Feb 8 11:22:25 CST 2002
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 07:34 AM 2/8/2002, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> >Could you have finished wiht a more dumb line? LGPL _is_ open source my
> This is not what Richard Stallman and Bradley Kuhn of the FSF say. They
> say, most emphatically, that it is NOT Open Source.
This is BS. Go read http://www.opensource.org/, in particular:
You obviously don't understand the issues at hand, and you don't seem to
make an effort to do so.
What RMS claims is that the xGPL is not only "Open Source", but a Free
Anyway, I really don't want to get into this debate. It really is
irrelevant for the present discussion.
More information about the wine-devel