ROTD (Rant Of The Day): patches
Dimitrie O. Paun
dimi at cs.toronto.edu
Thu Jan 31 15:54:13 CST 2002
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> I can't say I disagree with you, but I'll just note that all your
> patches are base64 encoded, which is not really better <g>
Oops <blush/> (but, ..., but, ... mine are Text/PLAIN at least :))
Sorry, I did not realise that. Speaking of which, I don't have the
slightest idea how to force Pine not to do that. Maybe the only way is to
actually _insert_ the text of the patch at the end of the message, but as
far as I know, there are some broken versions of Pine out that will mangle
the patch in sublte ways.
> IMO any mail that cannot be piped straight into patch should be rejected
Agreed. I am sorry I caused you grief by sending you base64 patches, from
my mailer POV they seemed to be "in clear".
> but I don't do it because it would take me more time to
> explain that to people sending patches and keep track of it all than
> it takes me to decode them. Maybe we should put an auto-rejecter of
> mime crap on the wine-patches list..
Yeah, that would be good. Maybe include something into the documentation
describing how to send the patch using various mailers?
More information about the wine-devel