self-registerable standard DLLs

[Tony Lambregts]

Alexandre Julliard wrote:

>"John K. Hohm" <jhohm at acm.org> writes:
>
>  
>
>>I noticed that the attempt to test comcat.dll on Win98 failed because
>>DllRegisterServer is a stub returning E_NOTIMPL.  I have added the
>>registry entries for the component categories manager to winedefault.reg,
>>which should suffice for normal Wine installations.  Despite this, is it
>>generally acceptable to have actual code to register/unregister a standard
>>COM server DLL in its Dll[Un]RegisterServer?  It would be redundant for
>>normal Wine, but hey, it's not big or complex.
>>    
>>
>
>Actually putting that in DllRegisterServer is arguably the right way
>to do it. What we should have is some kind of installation step that
>would register the Wine dlls, instead of having to put everything in
>winedefault.reg.
>
>  
>
Would it be a good idea to create a bug report for this?... Or does 
someone want to implement it right away...

Tony Lambregts