docbook (was: Re: ComputerName)
Dimitrie O. Paun
dpaun at rogers.com
Wed Nov 6 13:15:05 CST 2002
On November 6, 2002 12:40 pm, Martin Wilck wrote:
> The converted man pages could be part of CVS (as some other
> autogenerated files are) so that users wouldn't be required to have
> docbook in order to generate the manual pages.
We have to have the troff stuff in CVS, we can't require users
to have docbook tools installed. This is just like configure.
Bottom line, I think it's a good idea. I personally have no
love for troff, so if you feel like doing it... :)
More information about the wine-devel