Making documentation - was RE: Docu updates question..
tony_lambregts at telusplanet.net
Fri Nov 8 14:48:23 CST 2002
Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
>Like Vincent said, the most convenient form of the doc (I think), fails
>when you do :
>>2b. make html
>See bug #688 http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688
When I run "./make_winehq" (with the docbook packages installed) it
produces the html files in wine-doc with meaningfull names but "make
html" produces xNNNN files (just like bug report) so make_winehq is the
prefered method, yes? Is it realy a bug then?
I think that at the beginning of the document we had a getting started
section. This section would tell the developer that they needed to
install have jade, tetex, docbook and perl installed in order to create
html, pdf, and ps files from the sgml files. There should be links to
the section on what is required for the various distrbutions and what
command to run (./make_winhq).
Right now there is only the section for RedHat . I would be really nice
if we had sections for other distributions as well
The sections on setting up the docbook from section 126.96.36.199 on needs
work since it contains a lot of sections that are incomplete and to a
large extent it is unclear (to me) what is required.
As I pointed out before there is a bug about this
More information about the wine-devel