Dimitrie O. Paun
dpaun at rogers.com
Sun Oct 20 11:43:56 CDT 2002
On October 20, 2002 12:33 pm, Paul Rupe wrote:
> I was just looking at this same problem. Should we not also remove the
> line hdpa->nItemCount++? DPA_SetPtr already does this (which is why we
> needed the -1 you added), so I think we end up incrementing it twice.
You are correct. I've actually sent the patch in about 5minutes ago ... :)
> For comparison, here's the patch I was about to send (relative to the first
> comctl32undoc.c patch):
Yup, that's what we need to end up with.
More information about the wine-devel