something I intend working on that will help make wine "more complete"

[Dustin Navea]

Sorry for just jumping in here but that sounds good to me, at least that way
we know that they are in the code..  One thing I may be able to do relatively
soon is go thru and test apps that use those functions when they exist and
uncomment them to see if it makes things better or worse, or if they just
stay the same.

Not totally sure tho
--- Alexandre Julliard <julliard at winehq.org> wrote:
> Francois Gouget <fgouget at free.fr> writes:
> 
> > IMHO the more complete our spec files the better. Even if we just add
> > stubs.
> 
> In many cases apps will check for a function existence and call it if
> it exists, so adding a stub can actually break things compared to not
> having the function at all. If you want to add all these stubs then
> I'd suggest commenting them out until they either get implemented, or
> we find an app that really needs the entry point.
> 
> -- 
> Alexandre Julliard
> julliard at winehq.com
> 


=====
--
Dustin Navea

Minor Contributor, winehq.com
Buzilla Janitor, bugs.winehq.com
Network Admin, irc.blynk.net (down)

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com