ReactOS GPL vs. proprietary drivers - NTFS Driver under Linux + WINE

[Steven Edwards]

Hello Jan,
Comments are inline.

--- Jan Kratochvil <rcpt-ros-kernel.AT.reactos.com at jankratochvil.net>
wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> As GPLed Linux-NTFS still has no NTFS r/w capability I completed the
> project
> for reliable r/w access in Wine way by using MS-Windows ntfs.sys
> driver.
> 
> Captive-NTFS
> 	http://www.jankratochvil.net/

I have forwarded this reply to wine-devel as they my find captive NTFS
interesting
 
> My project is GPL-2.0 and it incorporates ReactOS kernel sources
> currently also
> carrying GPL-2.0 license. There are rumours GPL may be problem for
> linking with
> proprietary code (ntfs.sys&ntoskrnl.exe). I interpret it as GPL only
> affects
> _distribution_ of the program while no proprietary code is
> distributed with my
> package. Proprietary code is only run-time linked by the end-user.
> 
> 
> In a GPL-related discussion here two monts ago ReactOS developers
> were open for
> reusal of existing proprietary drivers for ReactOS as one of the
> significant
> feature of ReactOS. I would like an affirmation from the major
> ReactOS
> developers they are not going to try to sue me for releasing Captive
> NTFS.

I dont think you have to worry about any ReactOS developers filing
suit. I would be more worried about one from Microsoft =). In fact I am
very happy to see this. I would like to see the interface you have
developed evolve in to a a full compatiblty layer addon for WINE so
they can support other drivers. I must confess I have not had a chance
to look at the code but if it works as you say then this is great news!
If you dont distribute Captive NTFS with a Microsoft NTFS driver then
you should not have a problem. You are correct the GPL seems to only
cover distribution not use.

Thanks
Steven


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com