[ANN] Conformance testing campaign
wferi at afavant.elte.hu
Fri Sep 5 19:03:40 CDT 2003
Jakob Eriksson <jakob at vmlinux.org> writes:
> First - can I leave out the "of 55" tests? It is kind of
> difficult for me calculate how many tests there are in
> advance. Of course, I can do it - but it feels better if I
> know it is for a good cause.
You know, it was not that handy for me, either. I do not
need that, but the numbering does not make too much sense
without the total -- all the fuss happened to provide sort
of a "progress bar" for Dimitry. You will do it, won't you?
> So, what I am proposing is something similar to this flow,
> had it been done as a BAT:
> echo kernel32.dll:atom (test begin)>>results.txt
> kernel32_crosstest.exe atom>>results.txt
> echo kernel32.dll:atom done>>results.txt
All right. Instead of (test begin) simply put starts for
> Also - those not compiled, how about just not include them
> in the report? This I am more flexible about though.
Not really the same. Tests can also be missing because the
tester had to remove them, and I would like to discriminate
in this respect. See XP_robi for example.
>> If you could arrange that crashing tests die silently
>> (ie. without silly dialog boxes), that would be really
> Hm... I don't know. Is that possible?
No idea. But the best would be to recover the error code
and/or message somehow, and include in the report. Like
waitpid() on Posix. Is the tester has to click a couple of
times, then be it... It is surely impossible from a batch
script, but since you have a C framework, let us try to make
the most out of it!
> BTW, is "ver-sion" a pun? Good one. :-)
Heh, I think it is. Glad you like it.
More information about the wine-devel