More winecfg todos
saulius2 at ar.fi.lt
Tue Aug 17 15:43:37 CDT 2004
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Mike Hearn wrote:
> > 256 /home/s2/.wine/config
> > 4946 /home/s2/.wine/system.reg
> Maybe we should fork the Wine/Config branch into a separate .reg file to
> appease those who want to edit it using a text editor. That would make
> the switch from config file -> registry less obvious. Not exactly the
> same of course, no comments for one, no defaults to show you what they
> are for another,
Right, the clear Wine REG-file format only (in a separate file).
> but it might be an improvement?
I think yes, for me it would an improvement. The only bad thing here is
my lack of the ideas on how to implement such forking.
If it is a not very trivial stuff to code and if only a very few users
would become pleased with it, then the idea is dead already, right?
Whatever it be, I vote for the forking offered by Mike:
config-to-registry-through-a-separate-regfile, eg.: ~/.wine/config.reg .
PS I know, my english isn't OK. Hope I can be understood in right way.
More information about the wine-devel