vberon at mecano.gme.usherb.ca
Tue Nov 23 18:48:41 CST 2004
Le mar 23/11/2004 à 02:41, Shachar Shemesh a écrit :
> Vincent Béron wrote:
> >So all this boils down to is that RH shipped a glibc update which broke
> >backwards compatibility, with the same version number (glibc-2.3.2). A
> >Wine compiled on the newer version takes advantage of epoll support
> >being present, but will refuse to run on the older version.
> Had only that been the case. The newer glibc has the "epoll" symbols,
> but if you try to invoke them, they'll always return "not implemented".
> It's one of the weirdest moves by RedHat I've seen.
Then why do we link to them if they simply return "not implemented"? As
notepad works corectly with the newer glibc, I wonder if we do have a
fallback to the poll branch (I thought it was a compile-time define).
More information about the wine-devel