WIDL: use __RPC_FAR attribute for pointers in proxies

[Robert Shearman]

Mike Hearn wrote:

>> Yes, because it makes it easier to compare the output of midl and 
>> widl.  Additionally, I hope that projects other than Wine can use 
>> widl too one day...
>
>
> Yeah, I'd vote for *not* following the exact output of MIDL in WIDL 
> actually.
>
> - MIDL produces code that could compete in the worlds ugliest code
>   competition.
>
> - The casts it uses make new versions of gcc cry
>
> - There's a lot of junk in there we probably don't need (stubless proxy
>   support etc)


Stubless proxies are the only ones that are secure.

> I'd rather we produced clean, easily readable Wine style code rather 
> than copying the output of MIDL exactly. The code isn't magic, it 
> should not be difficult to simply compare the meaning of the code if 
> we're not sure it matches up.


Agreed.

Rob