wine/dlls wininet/wininet.spec uxtheme/uxtheme ...
fgouget at free.fr
Mon Sep 12 11:38:21 CDT 2005
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Robert Shearman <rob at codeweavers.com> writes:
>> Wouldn't it be better to extend the spec format to allow for a longlong
>> type instead?
I was wondering about that too.
> I considered doing that, but I decided it would just add complexity
> for no real reason. If we really need more detailed parameter info
> then we need to retrieve that directly from the source code IMO.
That's from memory so it should be checked, but I believe winapi_check
had a hack to check consistency between the spec file and the function
prototypes in the C files. This patch likely breaks that hack, but more
importantly winapi_check is going to think that the argument should be a
double now :-(
A longlong would be nice.
Francois Gouget fgouget at free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/
You can have my guns when you pry them from my kids cold, dead hands.
More information about the wine-devel