[PATCH 1/3] lz32/tests: Test more last errors set by
wine.dev at web.de
Tue Oct 3 13:59:54 CDT 2006
On Di, 2006-10-03 at 20:40 +0300, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> > It makes sense to check last error value only if an API has failed,
> > while you are adding last error checks everywhere. Unless you have an
> > application that depends on it, that's wrong.
> Well, thanks. I'll change that, but is it wrong just because it slightly
> increases code complexity for no direct benefit? I just want to know for
For the normal case, SetLastError() is called only on failure.
There might be some broken Applications, that expect GetLastError() to
return a special Value, even when a Function returns success, but they
will fail very fast on native Windows with a different version of
Windows, SP, Hotfix or Driver.
Do you have such a Application?
By by ... Detlef
More information about the wine-devel