New bugzilla components.
kai.blin at gmail.com
Sun Dec 16 15:37:46 CST 2007
On Sunday 16 December 2007 21:14:16 James Hawkins wrote:
> Ok, I'll start off the list. This is a first draft, open to changes
> and discussion. Entries with a (?) means I'm not sure.
> wine-net ->
If you delete that one, we definitely need a "winsock" component. Or ws2_32...
or wsock.. I prefer "winsock" as that matches the debug channel as well.
> wine-sspi -> (?) I prefer individual modules with a security or sspi
> keyword, but it's not up to me
> -> secur32
Coming to think about that, if we're fine to add more categories for things
like secur32.dll, how about splitting up those by debug channel? E.g. my ntlm
provider has an "ntlm" debug channel, the kerberos provider that I keep
starting and restarting in some branches on my box always uses "kerberos",
and Juan might want to use schannel as debug channel.
That would also help advanced users to correctly file bugs according to
fixmes, e.g. if they run into an unimplemented function.
WorldForge developer http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin
Samba team member http://www.samba.org/samba/team/
Will code for cotton.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20071216/345eab61/attachment.pgp
More information about the wine-devel