Resend 1/4 NtCreateMailslotFile tests

richardvoigt at richardvoigt at
Sun Feb 18 19:40:09 CST 2007

On 2/17/07, Eric Pouech <eric.pouech at> wrote:
> Jeff L a écrit :
> > Eric Pouech wrote:
> >> Jeff Latimer a écrit :
> >>> Establish the framework for testing NtCreateMailslotFile.  Have
> >>> fixed issues with NTSTATUS return codes etc.
> >> those tests belong to dlls/ntdll, not dlls/kernel32
> >> also, if the test is for ntdll functions, it shouldn't use kernel32
> >> ones... hence, NtClose should be used instead of CloseHandle
> > I put the proposition a while ago about putting the tests in kernel32
> > as, although they are ntdll functions,  they related to mailslot
> > functions and relating the tests would be easier on the tester.  I
> > take it that that is not the case?
> my call would be to put the tests for functions sitting in DLL X in the
> directory X/tests, even if we need to rewrite some code (or bother some
> code from some other tests)
> but as the API are different, we need in the end the both sets of test

perhaps split out ntdll tests, as in ntdll/tests/kernel32.c ?

More information about the wine-devel mailing list