Sources of noise on test.winehq.org?

Dan Kegel dank at kegel.com
Thu Apr 9 12:56:49 CDT 2009


On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Paul Vriens <paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com> wrote:
>> But suppressing or splitting the results from machines
>> that don't have a full set of results shouldn't hurt...
>>
> How many runs should have a box have before it's considered for the 'stable'
> list? We have 2 months worth of data, which roughly means 40 runs.

Easy: if it misses >= N reports during the period
being displayed, skip it.  N=1 would be strict.
We'd want to pick the lowest N that left enough data,
I suspect.



More information about the wine-devel mailing list