Anything wrong with this patch?

Jérôme Gardou jerome.gardou at gmail.com
Fri Jan 23 16:58:46 CST 2009


Ben Klein a écrit :
> 2009/1/24 Jérôme Gardou <jerome.gardou at gmail.com>:
>   
>> Ben Klein a écrit :
>>     
>>> 2009/1/24 Jerome Leclanche <adys.wh at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> (Damnit, gmail interface)
>>>> Pipermail shows as empty, here.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Jérôme Gardou <jerome.gardou at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-January/067564.html
>>>>> Any comment on this one? Related to bug 15616.
>>>>>           
>>> Looks like
>>> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-January/067564.html
>>> has a brief description that says "See bug 15616", but the previous
>>> mail http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-January/067565.html
>>> has the actual patch.
>>>
>>> Jérôme, be more careful when submitting patches! :)
>>>       
>> strange... the first one is the original message, the second one looks like
>> the attachment... Maybe something wrong with thunderbird. I'll resend if
>> needed.
>>
>>     
>
> I just looked at bug 15616. Maybe you should look at it too.
>
> Also, please hit "Reply to all" so your message gets sent to the
> mailing list too :)
>
>
>   
Of course... Austin English already noticed my patch. Austin, any idea 
why it was rejected?

Sorry for the "reply to all", I forgot it this time...



More information about the wine-devel mailing list