[RFC] named pipe message-mode design

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton]

On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Alexandre Julliard <julliard at winehq.org> wrote:
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> writes:
>
>> so - what do people think?  would you agree that a user-space pipe
>> "proxy" is an effective solution?
>
> No, you are on the wrong track. That solution is ugly, inefficient, and

 i would imagine that inefficient is the _last_ thing on the list of
priorities.  "technically correctly fulfilling the semantics" i would
imagine would be the highest priority.

 "efficient" and "nice" can always be done later, yes?