[PATCH 4/4] winecfg: Cosmetic improvements to the about panel
joel at airwebreathe.org.uk
Tue Jun 1 16:17:49 CDT 2010
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 22:39 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Joel Holdsworth <joel at airwebreathe.org.uk> writes:
> > Are you sure? I really do think using PNGs is preferable. The PNG is
> > 22.8kB, whereas a BMP would be 237.2kB - over 10x larger! If I use a
> > BMP, it will make the winecfg executable bloat up 25%.
> > By contrast importing GDI+ or WIC seems to me like a small price to pay.
> We can add support for PNG icons after 1.2. Adding more dependencies to
> winecfg is much more risky than a bloated icon.
Ok, that's cool. I'll try and get that sorted within a couple of days.
One other question; I got some feedback from Andre Herschel saying that
the patch failed to apply to some of the language rc files. I suspected
he ran into problems with varying character encodings. Did the patch
"[PATCH 4/4] winecfg: Cosmetic improvements to the about panel" apply
cleanly for you?
More information about the wine-devel