AppDB, ratings and native vs. builtin trouble

Alexey Loukianov mooroon2 at mail.ru
Wed May 16 08:48:28 CDT 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

16.05.2012 17:34, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> If the user didn't have to manually do anything, it should be rated 
> platinum.

Is it the official position that have been agreed throughout Wine devteam and
AppDB maintainers? Because years ago I've been at first thinking just like
this, but later on was told by co-maintainer that the "official policy" is to
treat this dependencies like "overrides" for the cases where non-stubbed Wine
implementation of the same DLL exists. I've been surprised by this and asked
for confirmation and in the end was referenced to a mailing list archive.
There were a discussion there concerning this topic.

I hadn't been able to find that discussion today after all the years that had
passed since that moment, so that's why I wanted to bring this topic back on
surface.

- -- 
Best regards,
Alexey Loukianov                          mailto:mooroon2 at mail.ru
System Engineer,                            Mob.:+7(926)218-1320
*nix Specialist

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPs7AsAAoJEPB9BOdTkBUL6LAIAIH0Q4uxmHsTGZshfGbjnTmb
vuYQW7W19b2LpSpDZhZl6HFsQ4rT8XGgHa7Kx3L0lNXdiOkYT71nbh5qJPlhsi9y
tiYyDHUGa2wbB6Ljwbx+Jq9p1mlUzIRvwdAtM7EQWDyNCnk3Apliqtz9t/b01iXB
dGE9TdbjoXKDGma4dq2aEixL+6vBObPTQZ+SZgbXuWA13OnZxpU7qU7gOimll27l
FX8BaKK7Z1a6du/JM3jGsDUYZW74zIOhKOvjSMdaFOgfXvaJfwSy/pNxeypLSH4l
c3zv7k44Ikd3bbL1tVZM1A+Hpj/GSwwqtF8Fw3pXGFLuiyRVegyTl8YYydFYkIo=
=T0PW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the wine-devel mailing list