patch:add HANDLE

Nikolay Sivov bunglehead at
Mon Mar 3 07:28:34 CST 2014

On 3/3/2014 16:32, Akira Nakagawa wrote:
> It was a little hurtful that you have said...
> what did you mean of "dead code"?
I mean that code that your patch adds is not used.
> I've checked Windows itself uses it as public handle.
What does a public handle mean and what did you check exactly?
> My patch is not enough,you say,to be send,then I send after finished 
> eventlog functions works.
You shouldn't send everything as one patch either, it needs to be 
incremental but without dead parts.

Please CC wine-devel at if you want my reply.
> 2014年3月3日月曜日、Nikolay Sivov<bunglehead at 
> <mailto:bunglehead at>> さ んは書きました:
>     On 3/2/2014 15:18, 中川祥 wrote:
>>     Hum?
>>     I thought all the HANDLEs are hosted by server.
>     I don't think you need event log handles to be handled by server,
>     I'd rather had a service handling them.
>>     Hence,I did.
>>     It need be hosted by server because you need to distinguish one
>>     eventlog from the ohter,any way.
>     I'm not sure I follow you here.Anyway, you'll need some plan for
>     all parts involved (advapi32, logging service, something else?)
>     before sending such dead code patches.
>     Please keep wine-devel CC.
>>     2014年3月2日日曜日、Nikolay Sivov<bunglehead at
>>     <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bunglehead at');>> さんは書
>>     きました:
>>         On 3/2/2014 14:13, 中川祥 wrote:
>>>         Handle for eventlog.
>>>         It is different from event.
>>>         It's almost same as hfile,but more info needed.
>>>         Is it implemented?
>>         What event log API are you talking about? Why does this
>>         handle have to be maintained by a server?
>>>         2014-03-02 16:19 GMT+09:00 Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead at>:
>>>             On 3/2/2014 10:44, Akira Nakagawa wrote:
>>>             What's that about?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the wine-devel mailing list