finalizing 64-bit mixed mode issues

Paul Gofman gofmanp at gmail.com
Tue Feb 9 11:38:54 CST 2016


On 02/09/2016 08:10 PM, Vincent Povirk wrote:
> Changing the set of accepted IL code based on pointer size doesn't
> seem right to me (and even if it is, amd64 is the wrong thing to check
> for). The test indicates that .NET accepts the code either way, though
> it is actually broken on win32.
>
Do you think it worth changing the patch in a way would arch independent
(but crashing on such assemblies on x86), or wait for some reply on the
bug in Mono for now?



More information about the wine-devel mailing list