[PATCH 2/6] comctl32/tests: Test messages sent to the pager child.
bunglehead at gmail.com
Wed Apr 5 12:59:50 CDT 2017
On 05.04.2017 16:26, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am 2017-04-05 um 14:53 schrieb Nikolay Sivov:
>> Maybe I don't see a full picture yet, but doesn't this duplicate 'id'
>> flag? We use it for ListView/Header combined sequences for example.
> It's not exactly the same, "id" is more a generic extra payload field.
> The pager test e.g. uses it to communicate a message id in a WM_NOTIFY
> In the tests I currently have no extra payload, so I could use the id
> mechanism instead of extending the parent / control flag.
I think it's better, and will match what we're doing already for other
I could also
> use it in patch 6 to deal with the WINDOWPOS structures. But I'll need
> both child1/child2 info and WINDOWPOS in the same lines, so I can't do both.
Do you really need to test it this way? Could it be tested right in
window procedure while processing POSCHANGED?
More information about the wine-devel