[PATCH 2/5] usp10: Avoid LPPOINT.

Aric Stewart aric at codeweavers.com
Wed Mar 22 11:10:20 CDT 2017



On 3/22/17 11:05 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 22 March 2017 at 16:45, Aric Stewart <aric at codeweavers.com> wrote:
>> I think I would personally almost prefer if all 4 of these where one patch. A few of them are only 1-2 changes and this one does both avoid LPPOINT and avoid LPCVOID, some of them rename variables as well. All changes I am happy to sign-off on.
>>
> I can do that if you think that makes it easier to review, but note
> that I have 3 more patches for this kind of cleanup. Generally
> speaking I think we prefer to err on the side of splitting things up.
> 
> For what it's worth, the rule I've been using is to treat changing a
> line the same as writing new code. I.e., if there are other issues in
> the same line, fixing those as well, unless there's a reason not to,
> like changing behaviour or requiring changes in a lot of other lines
> as well.
> 

I personally am less passionate about the size of the changes so I can go either way, I just like feeling like the commit messages clearly reflect the changes. So maybe just renaming "Avoid LPCWSTR" to "Style cleanups including Avoid LPCWSTR" then I am on board. 

-aric



More information about the wine-devel mailing list