[PATCH] ucrtbase: Implement _o__stricmp().

[Piotr Caban]

On 6/4/19 3:18 PM, Józef Kucia wrote:
> Would it make sense to wire up other _o__ functions instead of adding them
> on case by case basis?

We still don't know why the functions were introduced. Taking into 
account that there are multiple applications that are happy with calling 
functions without _o__ prefix I'm not against such change.

Thanks,
Piotr