[PATCH 2/5] ntdll: Implement RtlWalkFrameChain() for x86 and x86_64.

[Giovanni Mascellani]

Hi,

Il 22/10/21 15:53, Paul Gofman ha scritto:
> Yes, I could, but do you think another check is really needed? It feels 
> to me that might make the check more fragile than it already is. I'd 
> rather consider maybe just dropping such check if it will be considered 
> concerning. I added that only because I spotted the actual bug on x86 
> skipping the first frame and wanted to illustrate / verify that.

No, it's not really needed. If you think we're better off without it, 
that's fine for me.

Giovanni.