LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

[Julien]

Sorry Mike but from an external point of view your argument sounds like
ideology:
1) I dont understand why someone contributing to ReactOS would have
his/her code rejected in all cases. Contributing to ReactOS does not
necessary means the code is "dirty" reverse engineering.

2) The author stressed he did not develop this code by any reverse
engineering.

Now I have two questions: 
How is it possible to consider rejecting the code without even looking
or commenting the patches? Why do you base your argument on ideology and
not on facts?

What is the point of having another Wine contributor to reimplement the
exact same code, rediscover the exact same stuff?

The setupapi patches are perhaps incomplete, perhaps the format of the
patches are not perfect but rejecting the patches because the author is
@reactos.org seems uncorrect.

Best,
Julien (wannabe wine hacker)