Road to 0.9

Andreas Mohr andi at
Tue Mar 19 11:48:38 CST 2002

On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:22:42AM -0800, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Andreas Mohr <andi at> writes:
> > In fact I raised my eyebrows on that statement of him, too.
> > 
> > There's probably a lot of NT object stuff that's not 150% implemented yet,
> > I think.
> > And if the wineserver protocol isn't independent from such changes
> > (I dunno about that), then it certainly can't be considered truly "stable".
> The point is not to freeze the protocol completely, it will clearly
> continue to evolve even after 1.0. The idea is that once the protocol
> is declared frozen all future changes are done in a way that preserves
> backwards compatibility. And the mechanisms to do that are mostly in
> place now, which is what I mean by saying it is finished.
OK, so in other words the wineserver *is* more or less "independent from
such changes".

That's nice to know :)

Andreas Mohr                        Stauferstr. 6, D-71272 Renningen, Germany
Tel. +49 7159 800604      

More information about the wine-devel mailing list