compiling test.idl with dceidl - bit lairy and archaic
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at lkcl.net
Wed Jan 19 18:25:46 CST 2005
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 07:11:03PM -0500, Wez Furlong wrote:
> IIRC, there is a header file somewhere (on windows?) that maps from
> MS-DCE-RPC to regular-DCE-RPC. (or the other way around?)
yes. i saw it somewhere, five years ago.
it'd cover the data structures, but not the function calls.
or would it? is it _that_ well structured such that a simple
_macro_ would do the job????
what you reckon, wez?
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > _oh_ look, they're almost absolutely identical _except_ for
> > microsoft's habit of going "that's stupid to have the status
> > as an argument, we can't possibly have _that_, _let's_ return
> > it as the return result instead" and my all-time-favourite
> > #define UpperCaseBull upper_case_bull trick that had me
> > tearing my hair :)
> > *sigh*
More information about the wine-devel