[Wine] what is faster: wine20041019 or 0.9

[Matthew L Reed]

My understanding is that amule is not being currently maintained, and I like 
eMule. I could be easily persuaded to run a native ed2k client if I could 
find a good one, do you (or anyone else here) know of any?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sylvain Petreolle" <spetreolle at yahoo.fr>
To: <wine-users at winehq.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Wine] what is faster: wine20041019 or 0.9


> --- Matthew L Reed <matty at zootal.com> a écrit :
> <...>
>>
>> Example - run eMule. It is unbearably slow. Is it eMule, or Wine?
> in this particular case, why not run some linux ed2k client ? (aMule ?)
>
> Kind regards,
> Sylvain Petreolle (aka Usurp)
> --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
> Tired of a proprietary Windows on your computer ?
> Use free ReactOS instead ( http://www.reactos.org )
>
> _______________________________________________
> wine-users mailing list
> wine-users at winehq.org
> http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users