29 Jan
2011
29 Jan
'11
1:53 p.m.
Dear all,
While test another online bank with wine ActiveX,
I got an unimplemented fuction of ntoskrnl: IoGetDeviceInterfaces,
I found it listed in http://source.winehq.org/WineAPI/ntoskrnl.html as a stup,
so I can't understand this log:
wine: Unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces called
at address 0x7b839552 (thread 0022), starting debugger...
Grateful for any explain!
env:
wine1.3.12 on Ubuntu 10.04
Here are the steps:
1. install an ActiveX from
https://e.bank.ecitic.com/perbank5/plugs/CNCBSecPkg_EN.exe
$ rm -rf ~/.wine
$ winetricks -q mfc42
$ wine CNCBSecPkg_EN.exe
fixme:ole:DllRegisterServer stub
fixme:win:DisableProcessWindowsGhosting : stub
fixme:msg:ChangeWindowMessageFilter c057 00000001
fixme:msg:ChangeWindowMessageFilter c057 00000001
fixme:msg:ChangeWindowMessageFilter c057 00000001
fixme:ole:CoCreateInstance no instance created for interface
{ea1afb91-9e28-4b86-90e9-9e9f8a5eefaf} of class
{56fdf344-fd6d-11d0-958a-006097c9a090}, hres is 0x80004002
fixme:sfc:SfcIsFileProtected ((nil), L"C:\\Program
Files\\\4e2d\4fe1\94f6\884c\7f51\94f6\5b89\5168\63a7\4ef6\\unins000.exe")
stub
fixme:win:WINNLSEnableIME hUnknown1 0x1011a bUnknown2 0: stub!
fixme:win:WINNLSEnableIME hUnknown1 0x1011a bUnknown2 -1: stub!
fixme:win:WINNLSEnableIME hUnknown1 0x1011a bUnknown2 0: stub!
wine: Call from 0x7b839552 to unimplemented function
ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces, aborting
wine: Unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces called
at address 0x7b839552 (thread 002b), starting debugger...
wine: Call from 0x7b839552 to unimplemented function
ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces, aborting
wine: Call from 0x7b839552 to unimplemented function
ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces, aborting
2. open the online bank entry with wine builtin IE, then IE will crash:
$ wine iexplore https://e.bank.ecitic.com/perbank5/signIn.do
Please checkout the full log here:
http://pastebin.com/rbAg7gwj
Should I file a singel bug in ntoskrnl component , or separate bugs,
one for ntoskrnl and one for the IE crashing?
Generalliy what component should I switch while file a bug about IE crashing?
Many thanks!
--
Regards,
Qian Hong
-
Sent from Ubuntu
http://www.ubuntu.com/
29 Jan
29 Jan
4:59 p.m.
New subject: ntoskrnl.exe: unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces
On 1/29/2011 16:53, Qian Hong wrote:
Dear all,
While test another online bank with wine ActiveX,
I got an unimplemented fuction of ntoskrnl: IoGetDeviceInterfaces,
I found it listed in http://source.winehq.org/WineAPI/ntoskrnl.html as a stup,
so I can't understand this log:
wine: Unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces called
at address 0x7b839552 (thread 0022), starting debugger...
Grateful for any explain
Please open bugs for such issues. wine-devel is for
development process
related discussions, not for user support.
30 Jan
30 Jan
3:09 p.m.
New subject: ntoskrnl.exe: unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces
On 1/29/11 6:53 AM, Qian Hong wrote:
Dear all,
While test another online bank with wine ActiveX,
I got an unimplemented fuction of ntoskrnl: IoGetDeviceInterfaces,
I found it listed in http://source.winehq.org/WineAPI/ntoskrnl.html as a stup,
so I can't understand this log:
wine: Unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces called
at address 0x7b839552 (thread 0022), starting debugger...
Grateful for any explain!
Qian:
I would like to echo Nikolay's comment and add one more:
Please search through the Bug Reports before submitting a new one.
You might receive more assistance on the Wine User list as well. Most
of the developers lurk there.
Thank you.
James McKenzie
2 Feb
2 Feb
7:34 a.m.
Dear Nikolay and James,
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:09 PM, James McKenzie
<jjmckenzie51(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
Qian:
I would like to echo Nikolay's comment and add one more:
Please search through the Bug Reports before submitting a new one.
I really feel very sorry, I apologize for posting such issues the
wrong place and making noise. Thank you for your reminder and your
nice work on wine.
I have searched the Bugzilla with ntoskrnl.exe as keyword carefully,
it seems that none of the current bugs mentions unimplemented function
ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces, so I report a new issue here:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25964
Wish it not a duplicate.
You might receive more assistance on the Wine User list as well. Most of
the developers lurk there.
I'll post such mails on the Wine User list from now on.
However, may I modestly consults below questions here:
1. If a function is implemented in wine dll as a stup, then usually
this function won't cause crash,
and the wine debug will output "fix:me ...stup" rather then
"Unimplemented function", is it right?
2. If a function is listed in the Wine API guide,
http://source.winehq.org/WineAPI/ , and marked as stup,
then this function must be implemented as a stup in wine source code,
is it right?
I've read http://wiki.winehq.org/DebugChannels and
http://wiki.winehq.org/Developers-Hints,
but I still have some confusion.
Thanks a lot!
Thank you.
--
Regards,
Qian Hong
-
Sent from Ubuntu
http://www.ubuntu.com/
11:48 a.m.
2011/2/2 Qian Hong <fracting(a)gmail.com>
Dear Nikolay and James,
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:09 PM, James McKenzie
<jjmckenzie51(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
enough for
the application to proceed.
WineAPI is parsed from wine code, so if it says "stub" in the spec file of
that dll it means there is no implementation yet, and a stub can be
produced.
Qian:
I would like to echo Nikolay's comment and add one more:
Please search through the Bug Reports before submitting a new one.
I really feel very sorry, I apologize for posting such issues the
wrong place and making noise. Thank you for your reminder and your
nice work on wine.
I have searched the Bugzilla with ntoskrnl.exe as keyword carefully,
it seems that none of the current bugs mentions unimplemented function
ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces, so I report a new issue here:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25964
Wish it not a duplicate.
You might receive more assistance on the Wine User list as well. Most of
the developers lurk there.
I'll post such mails on the Wine User list from now on.
However, may I modestly consults below questions here:
1. If a function is implemented in wine dll as a stup, then usually
this function won't cause crash,
and the wine debug will output "fix:me ...stup" rather then
"Unimplemented function", is it right?
2. If a function is listed in the Wine API guide,
http://source.winehq.org/WineAPI/ , and marked as stup,
then this function must be implemented as a stup in wine source code,
is it right?
I've read http://wiki.winehq.org/DebugChannels and
http://wiki.winehq.org/Developers-Hints,
but I still have some confusion.
Thanks a lot!
Thank you.
--
Regards,
Qian Hong
-
Sent from Ubuntu
http://www.ubuntu.com/
Yes, a stub is a first step to implement a function. Sometimes a stub is 
28 Sep
28 Sep
6:31 a.m.
New subject: ntoskrnl.exe: unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces
Most of the time window update work as it should.It automatically installed
updates and ask you for a occasional reboot.Visit our site for further
instruction https://unfitpc.com/ntoskrnl-exe
<https://unfitpc.com/ntoskrnl-exe> I am pretty sure that it is useful for
you.
--
Sent from: http://wine.1045685.n8.nabble.com/Wine-Devel-f1783025.html
6:32 a.m.
New subject: ntoskrnl.exe: unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces
Most of the time window update work as it should.It automatically installed
updates and ask you for a occasional reboot.Visit our site for further
instruction https://unfitpc.com/ntoskrnl-exe
<https://unfitpc.com/ntoskrnl-exe> I am pretty sure that it is useful for
you.
--
Sent from: http://wine.1045685.n8.nabble.com/Wine-Devel-f1783025.html
2081
days inactive
4880
days old
6 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
James McKenzie -
Nikolay Sivov -
Qian Hong -
rajan00 -
Ricardo Filipe