wine-devel December 2014

51 participants
126 discussions

Error handling in RpcBindingVectorFree (dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_binding.c)

by Gerald Pfeifer

Looking at RPC_STATUS WINAPI RpcBindingVectorFree( RPC_BINDING_VECTOR** BindingVector ) { RPC_STATUS status; ULONG c; TRACE("(%p)\n", BindingVector); for (c=0; c<(*BindingVector)->Count; c++) { status = RpcBindingFree(&(*BindingVector)->BindingH[c]); } HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, *BindingVector); *BindingVector = NULL; return RPC_S_OK; } we currently always ignore the outcome of RpcBindingFree and return RPC_S_OK. However, there is one case where RpcBindingFree returns something different (which is if *Binding is null when RPC_S_INVALID_BINDING is returned). What is the proper way of handling this? Just keeping the code as is and removing the unused status variable? Breaking the loop once RpcBindingFree returns something different from RPC_S_OK? Continuing and returning the first / the last status different from RPC_S_OK? Gerald

3 years, 6 months

ntoskrnl.exe: unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces

by Qian Hong

Dear all, While test another online bank with wine ActiveX, I got an unimplemented fuction of ntoskrnl: IoGetDeviceInterfaces, I found it listed in http://source.winehq.org/WineAPI/ntoskrnl.html as a stup, so I can't understand this log: wine: Unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces called at address 0x7b839552 (thread 0022), starting debugger... Grateful for any explain! env: wine1.3.12 on Ubuntu 10.04 Here are the steps: 1. install an ActiveX from https://e.bank.ecitic.com/perbank5/plugs/CNCBSecPkg_EN.exe $ rm -rf ~/.wine $ winetricks -q mfc42 $ wine CNCBSecPkg_EN.exe fixme:ole:DllRegisterServer stub fixme:win:DisableProcessWindowsGhosting : stub fixme:msg:ChangeWindowMessageFilter c057 00000001 fixme:msg:ChangeWindowMessageFilter c057 00000001 fixme:msg:ChangeWindowMessageFilter c057 00000001 fixme:ole:CoCreateInstance no instance created for interface {ea1afb91-9e28-4b86-90e9-9e9f8a5eefaf} of class {56fdf344-fd6d-11d0-958a-006097c9a090}, hres is 0x80004002 fixme:sfc:SfcIsFileProtected ((nil), L"C:\\Program Files\\\4e2d\4fe1\94f6\884c\7f51\94f6\5b89\5168\63a7\4ef6\\unins000.exe") stub fixme:win:WINNLSEnableIME hUnknown1 0x1011a bUnknown2 0: stub! fixme:win:WINNLSEnableIME hUnknown1 0x1011a bUnknown2 -1: stub! fixme:win:WINNLSEnableIME hUnknown1 0x1011a bUnknown2 0: stub! wine: Call from 0x7b839552 to unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces, aborting wine: Unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces called at address 0x7b839552 (thread 002b), starting debugger... wine: Call from 0x7b839552 to unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces, aborting wine: Call from 0x7b839552 to unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces, aborting 2. open the online bank entry with wine builtin IE, then IE will crash: $ wine iexplore https://e.bank.ecitic.com/perbank5/signIn.do Please checkout the full log here: http://pastebin.com/rbAg7gwj Should I file a singel bug in ntoskrnl component , or separate bugs, one for ntoskrnl and one for the IE crashing? Generalliy what component should I switch while file a bug about IE crashing? Many thanks! -- Regards, Qian Hong - Sent from Ubuntu http://www.ubuntu.com/

5 years, 8 months

ODBC Databases: Jet/Access success

by Barry Bird

Good Afternoon. In section 3.3.6.2 of your User Guide you ask readers to report successes with databases other than MS SQL. Well here's one (I know Access 2000 can work with Wine, but this doesn't require Access): How to set up Wine to enable Windows programs that read and write to Jet (Access) databases using ODBC. I write such programs in C and use the API defined in ODBC API Reference http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms714562%28VS.85%29.aspx They work fine on Windows and only require Mingw to be installed to compile and link them, both for console programs and those using Windows SDK. You then can write interactive programs in C which use a full-featured SQL database which comes bundled with Windows. No need to purchase Access. With the set-up below they will also run on Linux (Kubuntu 9.04) and Wine 1.1.26. You need to update the registry to install the Access drivers. Under Windows, export from the Registry to *.reg files the registry entries - HKLM\Software\ODBC - HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Jet all subsidiary keys and values come with them. You can carefully edit these files to remove drivers and DSNs you don't need. Import these files using the registry editor in wine: wine regedit.exe. You need to bring across from Windows to Windows\System32 under wine: clbcatq.dll comres.dll expsrv.dll msjet40.dll mswstr10.dll msjter40.dll msjint40.dll msjtes40.dll msrd3x40.dll odbc32.dll odbccp32.dll odbcji32.dll odbcjt32.dll odbcad32.exe odbcint.dll odbctrac.dll vbajet32.dll Register this server in wine: wine regsvr32.exe msjtes40.dll No need to install MDAC. To use Windows ODBC drivers, you have to override Wine's odbccp32.dll and odbc32.dll with the native versions because the Wine versions are currently wired directly to Linux's unixodbc. This can be done by setting up the ODBC Data Source Administrator odbcad32.exe using winecfg: - Add the program to the Applications tab - then in the libraries tab, pick from 'New override for library' drop-down odbc32.dll and odbccp32.dll add them and edit them to be Native for Windows. Then if you do wine odbcad32.exe this brings up the ODBC Data Source Administrator window as in the Windows Control Panel If needed, set up (System) DSNs using this program. Bring across the programs and *.mdb database files from Windows. Using winecfg, you need to set up each program you want to run with overrides for odbc32.dll and odbccp32.dll (Applications and Libraries tabs) as above. The programs should then run as they did in Windows but perhaps a bit slower with: wine Odbc-prog.exe This has been tested twice on a clean .wine install. I cannot vouch for support of all API and SQL facilities however. I hope someone finds this useful. Barry Bird

5 years, 11 months

IMM / IME work

by Aric Stewart

Hello all, I know this will only interest a small portion of you but thought i would give a quick update on the state of IMM32 since I have brought it to a major milestone. All the main patches are in which now separate IMM32 and IMEs. There is still more work to do but the major framework is in place. X11 XIM processing should be unchanged. However wine can now begin to load native windows IMEs as well. I have tested with windows ATOK20 (a popular Japanese IME) and successfully had text processing in a fully IME aware application. There are still clear issues to resolve in many aspects of this processing but we have forward progress. ImmInstallIME does not work yet, nor does switching keyboards. So to get the native IME to work you need to add this registry key. [System\\CurrentControlSet\\Control\\Keyboard Layouts\\<keyboard layout>] "Ime File"=<IME filename> so for example for ATOK20 in Japanese i used. [System\\CurrentControlSet\\Control\\Keyboard Layouts\\e0010411] "Ime File"="ATOK20W.IME" I would love to hear how well things work. I am sure using native IMEs will quickly show us many places where IMM32 needs to be improved. One issues I am going to investigate next is that sometimes non x11drv ime initialization, if occurring too early, causes x11drv to fail to create windows. I have not investigated with the latest changes to xim.c (which may already correct this problem) but if you see this problem this patch may help and i believe the IME_UpdateAssociation(NULL) is already unneeded. diff --git a/dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c b/dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c index d4df9f7..0c98136 100644 --- a/dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c +++ b/dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c @@ -475,7 +475,6 @@ static void X11DRV_OpenIM(Display *display, XPointer ptr, XP XUnregisterIMInstantiateCallback(display, NULL, NULL, NULL, X11DRV_OpenIM, wine_tsx11_unlock(); IME_XIMPresent(TRUE); - IME_UpdateAssociation(NULL); } thanks, -aric

7 years, 11 months

[PATCH] Use asserts for mmap failure modes

by Michael Gilbert

Hi, Using exit in shared libraries is a discouraged practice, and wine's mmap implementation currently does that. I attach a proposed change using asserts instead. Let me know if you have any feedback. Best wishes, Mike (btw I'm the debian wine maintainer)

8 years, 10 months

Re: XInput [1/4]: Implement XInputGetState

by Stefan Dösinger

Am 09.07.2009 um 02:58 schrieb Michael Gruber: > This patch series implements parts of the XInput library. You can use > this to play games that support Xbox 360 Controllers. To be able to > use this you will need to have your Controller working on Linux via > the xpad kernel driver and the event interface. It will not work on > any OS other than Linux. It supports gamepads, should work with > guitars and wheels, but will not work with dance-mats. > <1-XInputGetState.patch> Is it possible to implement XInput on top of DirectInput? DirectInput already has some internal abstraction layers for differnet joystick APIs, and has basic support for OSX joysticks. Does DInput have enough capabilities to access all the Xbox controller's features? My gut says no, otherwise MS wouldn't have created a new lib. I guess its worth checking though.

8 years, 11 months

Wine 64 bit

by Kevin Davies

Hello, Where would you find information on wine64 status for running 64 bit windows software under OSX. These days a lot of Windows programs are going 64bit to make use of the available memory. Its becoming necessary to have this capability. Many thanks Kevin

8 years, 12 months

Re: [PATCH] user32/tests: Test SetUserObjectInformation for invisible winstation.

by Alexandre Julliard

Qian Hong <qhong(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > --- > dlls/user32/tests/winstation.c | 57 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+) Can you please fix the test failures introduced by your previous changes first? cf. https://test.winehq.org/data/tests/user32:winstation.html -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

9 years, 1 month

Re: [PATCH 8/9] wined3d: Filter messages generated by focus handling.

by Henri Verbeet

On 4 December 2014 at 21:51, Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > We may want to consider moving mode changes, window setup and focus loss > handling into the client libs. With this patch and the next one we have > 3 wined3d flags just for focus loss handling. Furthermore, dxgi yet > again has different behavior - it doesn't hook the window procedure and Yeah, possibly, although I'd also like to keep the amount of Win32 specific stuff in the public wined3d API to a minimum, so I'd rather not have the client libs e.g. handle window messages directly. > diff --git a/dlls/wined3d/device.c b/dlls/wined3d/device.c > index ae6600e..89ec00a 100644 > --- a/dlls/wined3d/device.c > +++ b/dlls/wined3d/device.c > @@ -4961,7 +4961,7 @@ void device_invalidate_state(const struct wined3d_device *device, DWORD state) > LRESULT device_process_message(struct wined3d_device *device, HWND window, BOOL unicode, > UINT message, WPARAM wparam, LPARAM lparam, WNDPROC proc) > { > - if (device->filter_messages) > + if (device->filter_messages && message != WM_DISPLAYCHANGE) That seems pretty specific. I'd be curious how other broadcast messages are handled.

9 years, 4 months

Re: [PATCH 9/9] wined3d: Pass WM_SYSCOMMAND(SC_RESTORE) to DefWindowProc.

by Henri Verbeet

On 4 December 2014 at 21:51, Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > diff --git a/dlls/wined3d/device.c b/dlls/wined3d/device.c > index 89ec00a..51dabd4 100644 > --- a/dlls/wined3d/device.c > +++ b/dlls/wined3d/device.c > @@ -4992,6 +4992,16 @@ LRESULT device_process_message(struct wined3d_device *device, HWND window, BOOL > > device->device_parent->ops->activate(device->device_parent, wparam); > } > + else if (message == WM_SYSCOMMAND) > + { > + if (wparam == SC_RESTORE && !(device->wined3d->flags & WINED3D_NO_SYSCOMMAND_HANDLING)) I'm not really a fan of this kind of double negative. The way the flag is used, it also seems to be about restores in particular instead of syscommands in general. > + { > + if (unicode) > + DefWindowProcW(window, message, wparam, lparam); > + else > + DefWindowProcA(window, message, wparam, lparam); > + } > + } > > if (unicode) > return CallWindowProcW(proc, window, message, wparam, lparam); Is this really how it's supposed to work? In particular, should DefWindowProc really always get the message before the application does, or should we give the application a chance first, and only pass to DefWindowProc if it doesn't handle the message?

9 years, 4 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel December 2014