wine-devel June 2004

120 participants
231 discussions

by James Courtier-Dutton

The Windows api method uses the function call IDvdInfo2::GetDiscID http://msdn.microsoft.com/archive/default.asp?url=/archive/en-us/directx9_c… This returns a unique 64bit ID for a DVD. Has anyone found out what exactly it does to create this 64bit ID. It would be nice to get linux DVD players to be able to use the same method. Cheers James

19 years, 1 month

text edit box not painting text ( on form startup )

by Doug Herbert

( I have posted a similiar question in wine-users, don't flame me for doing so, just thinking about this some more, perhaps it may be more a developer question ) Ok, I have a windows app, that runs under wine fine - not quite. This app has a form, with many text field edit boxes on. Quite often these edit boxes already have text values, ie. they are not empty - there is a database behind the form. Anyway, the form shows on the screen, but the text within the edit fields is invisible, until you activate each edit box component. When you leave one edit box to the next, the text remains visible. It seems like the repainting is not working, on initial startup of the form. As a way to debug this database app ( I don't have the source code for it ) I wrote a real basic form app in Visual Studio, with two edit boxes, with data in each. Now this basic app shows the text values immediately on startup. So there must be something different that the database app is not doing. I then ran wine using 'wine --debugmsg +edit programname' for both app's. I see both logging 'Creating ANSI edit control, style = xxxxx' but the style reference is different between apps - I am not sure if this the cause or not. The problem app reports style = 54011104 and the basic app shows style = 50010080. Can somebody explain what this style reference means and how do I force an app to use a certain style of edit box ? What other wine class debugmsg types should I use to narrow down the source of this problem ? Is there anyway I can check to see how the database app is repainting text within the text edit components ? Regards Doug Herbert. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

19 years, 1 month

Re: Wine on FreeBSD current

by Gerald Pfeifer

>> I'm just wondering if it is supposed to work as well as FreeBSD stable. Right now, Wine doesn't work at all on FreeBSD -STABLE: wine: failed to initialize: /swtest/wine/dlls/ntdll.dll.so: mmap of entire address space failed: Cannot allocate memory and before that I used to see deadlocks upon startup of non-trivial applications (such as Forte Agent, both 16bit and 32bit flavors). I believe there are also signficant threadings issues on -CURRENT, so overall Wine is hardly, if at all, usable on any version of FreeBSD I have access to, even though I'm still working to keep it at least compilable on FreeBSD 4.9 and 5.2/5.3. Gerald -- Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) gerald(a)pfeifer.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/

19 years, 5 months

Don't crash on failing DRIVER_FindFromHDrvr

by Uwe Bonnes

Hallo, I sent a patch to prevent wine from crashing last friday. It happend, when DRIVER_FindFromHDrvr returned NULL. No I found out, that I had sent that patch before last year. Eric answered > this doesn't seem right to me: either the loading fails and we shouldn't > get a valid handle, or it succeeds and we should be able to find it > there's must be something wrong elsewhere > could you please send a -debugmsg +driver,+module,+winmm to see what > happens ? and like before, I can't reproduce the error after reverting the patch: > the error no longer exists. I guess some registry entry was corrupt and a > successfull run corrected it later. > > However I see a lot of check after DRIVER_FindFromHDrvr() in other parts of > the code... If one dose "grep -3 DRIVER_FindFromHDrvr wine/dlls/winmm/*", every other usage of DRIVER_FindFromHDrvr is like if ((lpDrv = DRIVER_FindFromHDrvr(hDrvr)) != NULL) Why should expecting a NULL return be wrong? It happens, as the the crashes show. Bye -- Uwe Bonnes bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt --------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

19 years, 7 months

Wine bug with delphi Menus

by Robert van Herk

Hi people, I think I discovered a wine bug. In a delphi program, changing the visibility of a menuitem (TMenuItem) causes the whole menu of that form to stop working, when the program is run under Wine. Behind the screens, the setVisible of a menu item calls MenuChanged. This seems to put the menu in such a state that, in wine, all menu components stop doing anything. I've written a small application (455 kb EXE) to show what goes wrong. Would anybody be interested to help me in solving this bug? Would a message trace from Winsight (for example) be of any help? Greetings, Robert

19 years, 7 months

Remote operations -- need for advice

by Alexander Yaworsky

I'm thinking how to implement CreateRemoteThread and besides fix memory management functions. The complete (afaik) list includes: RtlCreateUserThread NtAllocateVirtualMemory NtFreeVirtualMemory NtProtectVirtualMemory NtQueryVirtualMemory NtLockVirtualMemory (do nothing?) NtUnlockVirtualMemory (do nothing?) NtFlushVirtualMemory NtMapViewOfSection NtUnmapViewOfSection Suggested implementation. Let's add two groups of handlers to the wineserver, something like remote_operation_xxxx and remote_operation_xxxx_complete. remote_operation should do the following: 1) suspend_for_ptrace(); 2) inject a piece of code into required process and start its execution; 3) resume_after_ptrace(); 4) place calling thread into suspended state (or into some wait state?) remote_operation_complete should prepare reply and resume thread suspended by remote_operation. Injected code should call required function and then remote_operation_complete in context of required process. The question is: how to correctly get address of function? imho possible solutions are: 1) assume ntdll loaded at the same address for all processes -- unreliable; 2) get dll base address from per-process dll list and parse ELF by hand -- too complicated (?); 3) pass relative offsets and add them later to the ntdll's base address -- unreliable a bit: ntdll may be replaced, although, it is unlikely; 4) extend the struct process (server/process.h) and the request init_process with pointers to required functions -- most reliable and simple but looks ugly. What do you think?

19 years, 8 months

Re: appdb dump

by Jeremy Newman

This is getting to be a common request. I think what I am going to do is make a script that tars up the appdb every night and puts it up for download. The only table it will not dump will be the userdb, for privacy reasons. I'll email you all again when I have something whipped up. On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 18:12, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote: > I'm trying to set up a copy of appdb on localhost to play with (and > hopefully use as a base for patches for you guys). Do you think I could > get a dump of the apps tables so that I can have a good set to test with? -- _ _ WebGeek/SysAdmin CodeWeavers -= http://www.codeweavers.com | \| |_____ __ ___ __ __ _ _ _ -= http://www.dracowulf.com | .` / -_) | | / ' \/ _` | ' \ -= mailto:[email protected] |_|\_\___|\_/\_/|_|_|_\__,_|_||_| -= ICQ: 1711553 Yahoo: laxdragon

19 years, 8 months

Re: Scrollbars, an application bug or a wine regression ? (#2314)

by Dmitry Timoshkov

"George Marshall" <g.marshall(a)nospam.com> wrote: > > Does reverting of the following patch help? > > Yes it does make the application work as it did before > the June Release :-) Do you have a small application I could test with? -- Dmitry.

19 years, 9 months

Yard sale windows app fun: Lotus SmartSuite '96. 1-2-3 works, WordPro doesn't.

by Dan Kegel

I went to a yard sale today, and that's always dangerous. Today I ended up buying a copy of Lotus SmartSuite '96. I then installed Wine-20040615.tar.gz and tried installing my new disc with $ wine d:\\install.exe It got all confused, started iterating through every file underneath my home directory, and printed out err:shell:SHGetFileInfoW pidl is null! for each one! On a hunch, I made my home directory look empty, $ mkdir .blort $ mv * .blort $ wine d:\\install.exe That seemed much better; Wine only printed out the SHGetFileInfoW error once, presumably for the lotustmp.000 directory it created in my home directory. The next problem was when a dialog box "Select a Program Group..." popped up. At about the same time, an error box with title "Setup Message" and body "Setup has encountered a problem. Please report File='COMMON\SYMTAB11.C',Line='618' to Microsoft Product Support Services." This looks a bit lot like http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;113252 which happens when GetWindowsDirectory() returns a string with lowercase letters, but clicking OK let me past with no ill affects, and I was able to install. At least when all I installed was Word Pro. When I also tried installing 1-2-3 and ScreenCam, I got the error "Lotus Setup" : "Install encountered an error trying to start Regedit.exe." That popped up twice, after which install thought for a long time, then warned fixme:ole:CoCreateInstance no classfactory created for CLSID {00021401-0000-0000-c000-000000000046}, hres is 0x80040154 and seemed to get stuck. Still, things seemed to be more or less well installed, so I tried running two of the apps. $ cd c/lotus/123/programs $ wine 123w.exe worked quite nicely. (Well, it did say the date was 6/17/104, but nobody's perfect!) Next I tried Word Pro: $ cd ~/.wine/c/lotus/wordpro $ wine wordpro.exe That failed immediately, so quickly that WINEDEBUG=+all wine wordpro.exe was practical to run. Here's part of its output. It looks as if the very first instruction accesses a null pointer in a strange way. 0009:Starting process L"C:\\lotus\\wordpro\\wordpro.exe" (entryproc=0x7a6aee) 0009:trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException code=c0000005 flags=0 addr=0x7a6aee 0009:trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException info[0]=00000001 0009:trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException info[1]=00000000 0009:trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException eax=00000000 ebx=403f1668 ecx=400c0be8 edx=400c0c37 esi=400c1000 edi=007a6aee 0009:trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException ebp=4070fff4 esp=4070ff30 cs=0023 ds=002b es=002b fs=003b gs=0033 flags=00010246 0009:trace:seh:EXC_CallHandler calling handler at 0x403e1708 code=c0000005 flags=0 0009:Call ntdll.NtQueryVirtualMemory(ffffffff,00000000,00000000,4070fac0,0000001c,4070fa84) ret=4037aeb8 0009:Ret ntdll.NtQueryVirtualMemory() retval=00000000 ret=4037aeb8 0009:Call ntdll.RtlImageDirectoryEntryToData(00000000,00000001,00000002,4070fabc) ret=4033fbbe 0009:trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException code=c0000005 flags=0 addr=0x40091368 0009:trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException info[0]=00000000 0009:trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException info[1]=00000000 0009:trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException eax=00000000 ebx=400beec4 ecx=00000001 edx=00000000 esi=00000000 edi=00000002 0009:trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException ebp=4070f9e4 esp=4070f928 cs=0023 ds=002b es=002b fs=003b gs=0033 flags=00010246 0009:trace:seh:EXC_CallHandler calling handler at 0x40089948 code=c0000005 flags=0 0009:trace:seh:EXC_RtlUnwind code=c0000005 flags=2 0009:trace:seh:EXC_CallHandler calling handler at 0x40088fc0 code=c0000005 flags=2 0009:trace:seh:EXC_CallHandler handler returned 1 0009:Ret ntdll.RtlImageDirectoryEntryToData() retval=00000000 ret=4033fbbe 0009:Call ntdll.NtCreateEvent(4070fac0,001f0003,4070fac4,00000001,00000000) ret=4033f836 0009:Ret ntdll.NtCreateEvent() retval=00000000 ret=4033f836 wine: Unhandled exception (thread 0009), starting debugger... ... Unhandled exception: page fault on write access to 0x00000000 in 32-bit code (0x007a6aee). In 32 bit mode. Register dump: CS:0023 SS:002b DS:002b ES:002b FS:003b GS:0033 EIP:007a6aee ESP:4070ff30 EBP:4070fff4 EFLAGS:00010246( - 00 -RIZP1) EAX:00000000 EBX:403f1668 ECX:400c0be8 EDX:400c0c37 ESI:400c1000 EDI:007a6aee Stack dump: 0x00000000: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0x00000010: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0x00000020: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0x00000030: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0x00000040: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0x00000050: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0x00000060: Backtrace: =>1 0x007a6aee (0x4070fff4) 2 0x4002e83d (0x00000000) 0x007a6aee: addb %al,0x0(%eax) Modules: 0x40070000-400c2000 Deferred ntdll 0x40320000-403f3000 Deferred kernel32 0x00400000-00888000 --none-- wordpro 0x402f0000-403f3000 Deferred kernel32<elf> 0x40019000-40025000 Deferred libnss_files.so.2 0x401b5000-401d7000 Deferred libm.so.6 0x400c2000-401b5000 Deferred libwine_unicode.so.1 0x40053000-400c2000 Deferred ntdll<elf> 0x40000000-40016000 Deferred ld-linux.so.2 0x4004f000-40052000 Deferred libdl.so.2 0x420155f0-841485f0 Deferred libc.so.6 0x40042000-4004f000 Deferred libpthread.so.0 0x4002a000-40042000 Sym libwine.so.1 0x420155f0-841485f0 Deferred libc.so.6 Module Address Debug info Name (14 modules) PE 0x00400000-00888000 --none-- wordpro ELF 0x40000000-40016000 Deferred ld-linux.so.2 ELF 0x40019000-40025000 Deferred libnss_files.so.2 ELF 0x4002a000-40042000 Sym libwine.so.1 ELF 0x40042000-4004f000 Deferred libpthread.so.0 ELF 0x4004f000-40052000 Deferred libdl.so.2 ELF 0x40053000-400c2000 Deferred ntdll<elf> \-PE 0x40070000-400c2000 Deferred ntdll ELF 0x400c2000-401b5000 Deferred libwine_unicode.so.1 ELF 0x401b5000-401d7000 Deferred libm.so.6 ELF 0x402f0000-403f3000 Deferred kernel32<elf> \-PE 0x40320000-403f3000 Deferred kernel32 ELF 0x420155f0-841485f0 Deferred libc.so.6 ELF 0x420155f0-841485f0 Deferred libc.so.6 Threads: process tid prio (all id:s are in hex) 0000000b (D) C:\lotus\wordpro\wordpro.exe 00000009 0 <== 00000010 00000011 0 WineDbg terminated on pid 0xb So I guess I got a couple hours worth of entertainment out of my $5, and I can now run Lotus 1-2-3 if I feel like it. Cool. - Dan -- My technical stuff: http://kegel.com My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change

19 years, 9 months

ioctl(/dev/dsp, SNDCTL_DSP_SETDUPLEX) failed

by Saulius Krasuckas

With thepatch [1] I am getting some this line from Wine: err:wave:OSS_RawOpenDevice ioctl(/dev/dsp, SNDCTL_DSP_SETDUPLEX) failed (Input/output error) Yes, my soundcard doesn't support full duplex, I believe (I have OPTi 82c931 chip with mad16 driver running here). But shouldn't the type of the message be WARN or TRACE instead of ERR then? [1] http://cvs.winehq.org/patch.py?id=12636

19 years, 9 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel June 2004