Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17911
Your paranoid android.
=== WVISTAADM (32 bit sync) ===
sync.c:923: Test failed: DeleteTimerQueueTimer
Hello friends,
according to these results, it looks like the test I added in the patch
crashes win2k SP4 but it works on all others. And it does not seem to be a
thing that it can be resolved with dynamic library loading.
So, what should I do?
Do I need to comment them like it has been done (for example) into
test_StrChrA()?
Do I need to remove interely the test and revive previous patch?
Please excuse my inexperience...
Sincerely,
Carlo Bramini.
>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: testbot(a)testbot.winehq.org
>Data: 16/04/2012 22.48
>A: <carlo.bramix(a)libero.it>
>Ogg: TestBot job 17900 results: [shlwapi] Add NULL checks to StrCpyW and
StrCatW
>
>VM Status Number of test failures
>WINEBUILD completed
>WNT4WSSP6 completed 0
>W2KPROSP4 completed 1
>WXPPROSP3 completed 0
>W2K3R2SESP2 completed 0
>WVISTAADM completed 0
>W2K8SE completed 0
>W7PRO completed 0
>W7PROX64 completed 0
>TEST64_W7SP1 completed 0
>W7PROX64 completed 0
>TEST64_W7SP1 completed 0
>
>=== WINEBUILD (build) ===
>No build failures found
>
>=== WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit string) ===
>No test failures found
>
>=== W2KPROSP4 (32 bit string) ===
>
>shlwapi:
>string: unhandled exception c0000005 at 77C7F8A8
>
>=== WXPPROSP3 (32 bit string) ===
>No test failures found
>
>=== W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit string) ===
>No test failures found
>
>=== WVISTAADM (32 bit string) ===
>No test failures found
>
>=== W2K8SE (32 bit string) ===
>No test failures found
>
>=== W7PRO (32 bit string) ===
>No test failures found
>
>=== W7PROX64 (32 bit string) ===
>No test failures found
>
>=== TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit string) ===
>No test failures found
>
>=== W7PROX64 (64 bit string) ===
>No test failures found
>
>=== TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit string) ===
>No test failures found
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17900
Your paranoid android.
=== W2KPROSP4 (32 bit string) ===
string: unhandled exception c0000005 at 77C7F8A8
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17893
Your paranoid android.
=== WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit scanf) ===
scanf.c:144: Test failed: sprintf retuned 10
scanf.c:145: Test failed: got 1942892530, expected 12345678901234
=== W2KPROSP4 (32 bit scanf) ===
scanf.c:144: Test failed: sprintf retuned 10
scanf.c:145: Test failed: got 1942892530, expected 12345678901234
=== WXPPROSP3 (32 bit scanf) ===
scanf.c:144: Test failed: sprintf retuned 10
scanf.c:145: Test failed: got 1942892530, expected 12345678901234
=== W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit scanf) ===
scanf.c:144: Test failed: sprintf retuned 10
scanf.c:145: Test failed: got 1942892530, expected 12345678901234
Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> writes:
> @@ -5546,24 +5546,70 @@ INT WINAPI WSAUnhookBlockingHook(void)
> * pointers (via a template of some kind).
> */
>
> -static int list_size(char** l, int item_size)
> +/***********************************************************************
> + * list_size (INTERNAL)
> + *
> + * Calculate the size of data and number of items from a list based on
> + * a fixed item size or strings by using strlen. The source list must be
> + * NULL terminated.
> + *
> + * PARAMS
> + * l [I] Pointer to array of source items.
> + * item_size [I] Fixed item size or zero if it's a string list.
> + * size_sum [O] Pointer to where the sum of item bytes will be
> + * stored. May be NULL if not required by the caller.
> + * item_count [O] Pointer to where the number of items bytes will be
> + * stored. May be NULL if not required by the caller.
> + *
> + * NOTES
> + * When item_size is zero the byte sum will also count the NULL
> + * terminator for each string.
> + */
> +static void list_size(char** l, int item_size, int *size_sum, int *item_count)
> {
> - int i,j = 0;
> - if(l)
> - { for(i=0;l[i];i++)
> - j += (item_size) ? item_size : strlen(l[i]) + 1;
> - j += (i + 1) * sizeof(char*); }
> - return j;
> + int s, c, *sum = (size_sum ? size_sum : &s), *count = (item_count ? item_count : &c);
> + *sum = *count = 0;
> + if(l)
> + {
> + for(;l[*count];(*count)++)
> + *sum += (item_size) ? item_size : strlen(l[*count]) + 1;
> + }
That's not a good helper function, with all the optional parameters and
various behaviors. Also if you need a big documentation block like this
for a 5-line function it's a sign that something is wrong.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org
Hi,
I've been trying to get WASAPI audio output working for our app as
Directsound output was very glitchy post the new audio stack.
All seems to work great with WASAPI however I need to able to set the
volume level independently for individual audio sessions / streams for
crossfading however I'm having problems controlling the volume levels of a
shared mode audio session / stream. specifically,
ISimpleAudioVolume::SetMasterVolume
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd316537(v=vs.85).a…
Doesn't seem to work under Wine i.e.
HRESULT hr;
hr=audioClient_->GetService(IID_ISimpleAudioVolume,(void**)&simpleAudioVolume_);
if (SUCCESS(hr))
hr=simpleAudioVolume_->SetMasterVolume(0.1,NULL);
returns success but does not change the volume level though interestingly
HRESULT hr;
hr=audioClient_->GetService(IID_ISimpleAudioVolume,(void**)&simpleAudioVolume_);
if (SUCCESS(hr))
hr=simpleAudioVolume_->SetMute(TRUE,NULL);
does work and mute the volume.
I've also tried usingsthe IAudioStreamVolume interface to control the
volume again to no avail.
Does anyone have any experience of these interfaces or know equivalent
interfaces to use instead working I've tested on :
Ubuntu 10.04, 11.10
Wine 1.4 , 1.5 , 1.5.2
PulseAudio 0.9.21 , 1.0 , no pulse audio
(and windows 7 where the code works fine)
Thanks,
Adam
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17883
Your paranoid android.
=== WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== WVISTAADM (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W2K8SE (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W7PRO (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W7PROX64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found
Hi
testbot.winehq.com certificate expired on 13-04-2012. So now the wininet
tests in dlls/wininet/tests/http.c are failing with an error for me.
I can't determine if the fault are in the test or the function called
should handle the error case.
The error message is:
err:wininet:NETCON_secure_connect SSL_connect failed: 12037
http.c:2873: Test failed: HttpSendRequest failed: 12037
wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x00000008 at address
0x68a876c5 (thread 0009), starting debugger...
Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x00000008 in 32-bit
code (0x68a876c5).
Best Regards
Morten Rønne