20 Sep
2001
20 Sep
'01
7:11 p.m.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:38:11PM -0500, Aric Stewart wrote:
The behavior for wsprintfA is different that for
wsprintf16 in how it
handles NULLs being passed as character parameters. This patch fixes
that.
Hmm, can't you add a small comment inside the code that actually
mentions
this remarkable difference ?
I think we should make every effort possible to ensure that important
differences between architectures are being preserved as well as possible.
--
Andreas Mohr Stauferstr. 6, D-71272 Renningen, Germany
21 Sep
21 Sep
2:26 p.m.
New subject: wsprintf
I think this is part of what the change log is for.
Alexandre has committed the patch, i will ask him if he wants me to
document something further and submit another patch.
-aric
Andreas Mohr wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:38:11PM -0500, Aric Stewart wrote:
The behavior for wsprintfA is different that for
wsprintf16 in how it
handles NULLs being passed as character parameters. This patch fixes
that.
Hmm, can't you add a small comment inside the code that actually
mentions
this remarkable difference ?
I think we should make every effort possible to ensure that important
differences between architectures are being preserved as well as possible.
--
Andreas Mohr Stauferstr. 6, D-71272 Renningen, Germany
8276
days inactive
8277
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Andreas Mohr -
Aric Stewart