24 Nov
2007
24 Nov
'07
3:01 a.m.
interesting. Do you have a list of contributors and their signoff on
this license change?
Or is it just you two?
On Nov 24, 2007 12:36 PM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
<alex(a)thehandofagony.com> wrote:
Change licence to AGPL
Alexander N. Sørnes
24 Nov
24 Nov
3:34 a.m.
New subject: [AppDB] Change licence to AGPL
On Saturday 24 November 2007 04:01:24 Trent Waddington wrote:
interesting. Do you have a list of contributors and
their signoff on
this license change?
Or is it just you two?
Well I didn't think that was necessary; but after some thought I realize that
the AppDB only seemed to include a LICENSE file containing the GPL v2, while
a GPL/AGPL v3 change would require previous code to be licenced under 'GPL v2
or later'.
So I'm including the other authors in this mail to see if they agree, or have
already licenced their code under GPL v2 or later
Sorry for all the mess, but legal stuff isn't really my thing. :)
Alexander N. Sørnes
On Nov 24, 2007 12:36 PM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
<alex(a)thehandofagony.com> wrote:
> Change licence to AGPL
>
>
>
> Alexander N. Sørnes
4:42 a.m.
New subject: [AppDB] Change licence to AGPL
I think I'm ok with the gpl/agpl v3 change. Are there any other people
using the appdb code that this might affect?
Chris
On Nov 23, 2007 10:34 PM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
<alex(a)thehandofagony.com> wrote:
On Saturday 24 November 2007 04:01:24 Trent Waddington
wrote:
interesting. Do you have a list of contributors
and their signoff on
this license change?
Or is it just you two?
Well I didn't think that was necessary; but after some thought I realize that
the AppDB only seemed to include a LICENSE file containing the GPL v2, while
a GPL/AGPL v3 change would require previous code to be licenced under 'GPL v2
or later'.
So I'm including the other authors in this mail to see if they agree, or have
already licenced their code under GPL v2 or later
Sorry for all the mess, but legal stuff isn't really my thing. :)
Alexander N. Sørnes
On Nov 24, 2007 12:36 PM, Alexander Nicolaysen
Sørnes
<alex(a)thehandofagony.com> wrote:
> Change licence to AGPL
>
>
>
> Alexander N. Sørnes
1:54 p.m.
New subject: [AppDB] Change licence to AGPL
On Saturday 24 November 2007 05:42:46 Chris Morgan wrote:
I think I'm ok with the gpl/agpl v3 change. Are
there any other people
using the appdb code that this might affect?
Chris
I don't know of anyone using the AppDB at the moment.
Alexander
On Nov 23, 2007 10:34 PM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
<alex(a)thehandofagony.com> wrote:
> On Saturday 24 November 2007 04:01:24 Trent Waddington wrote:
> > interesting. Do you have a list of contributors and their signoff on
> > this license change?
> >
> > Or is it just you two?
>
> Well I didn't think that was necessary; but after some thought I realize
> that the AppDB only seemed to include a LICENSE file containing the GPL
> v2, while a GPL/AGPL v3 change would require previous code to be licenced
> under 'GPL v2 or later'.
>
> So I'm including the other authors in this mail to see if they agree, or
> have already licenced their code under GPL v2 or later
>
> Sorry for all the mess, but legal stuff isn't really my thing. :)
>
>
> Alexander N. Sørnes
>
> > On Nov 24, 2007 12:36 PM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
> >
> > <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> wrote:
> > > Change licence to AGPL
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Alexander N. Sørnes
6:13 a.m.
New subject: [AppDB] Change licence to AGPL
On Nov 24, 2007 1:34 PM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
<alex(a)thehandofagony.com> wrote:
Well I didn't think that was necessary; but after
some thought I realize that
the AppDB only seemed to include a LICENSE file containing the GPL v2, while
a GPL/AGPL v3 change would require previous code to be licenced under 'GPL v2
or later'.
So I'm including the other authors in this mail to see if they agree, or have
already licenced their code under GPL v2 or later
Sorry for all the mess, but legal stuff isn't really my thing. :)
Yeah, it doesn't matter if they have licensed it under the GPL v2 or
later or not, you can't change the license on their code without their
permission, and if you don't get that permission in writing then they
can contest it at a later date should they ever decide they didn't
want the license changed.
Legal stuff is always messy :)
Trent
3 Dec
3 Dec
10:50 a.m.
New subject: [AppDB] Change licence to AGPL
Hey,
On Nov 24, 2007 4:34 AM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
<alex(a)thehandofagony.com> wrote:
On Saturday 24 November 2007 04:01:24 Trent Waddington
wrote:
Yup, I'm ok with that change.
The image.php class was written by me for another project. And just
reused for the appdb. I've later included it all kind of different
projects (open and closed). And never really gave it a second thought.
Does this cause trouble?
Paul
interesting. Do you have a list of contributors
and their signoff on
this license change?
Or is it just you two?
Well I didn't think that was necessary; but after some thought I realize that
the AppDB only seemed to include a LICENSE file containing the GPL v2, while
a GPL/AGPL v3 change would require previous code to be licenced under 'GPL v2
or later'.
So I'm including the other authors in this mail to see if they agree, or have
already licenced their code under GPL v2 or later 
10:14 p.m.
New subject: [AppDB] Change licence to AGPL
Paul van Schayck wrote:
Hey,
On Nov 24, 2007 4:34 AM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
<alex(a)thehandofagony.com> wrote:
No, your own code can be licensed however you want in as many different
ways as you want.
Thanks,
Scott Ritchie
On Saturday 24 November 2007 04:01:24 Trent
Waddington wrote:
Yup, I'm ok with that change.
The image.php class was written by me for another project. And just
reused for the appdb. I've later included it all kind of different
projects (open and closed). And never really gave it a second thought.
Does this cause trouble?
Paul
interesting. Do you have a list of contributors
and their signoff on
this license change?
Or is it just you two?
Well I didn't think that was necessary; but after some thought I realize that
the AppDB only seemed to include a LICENSE file containing the GPL v2, while
a GPL/AGPL v3 change would require previous code to be licenced under 'GPL v2
or later'.
So I'm including the other authors in this mail to see if they agree, or have
already licenced their code under GPL v2 or later
6013
days inactive
6022
days old
7 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes -
Chris Morgan -
Jonathan Ernst -
Paul van Schayck -
Scott Ritchie -
Trent Waddington