--- Greg Turner <gmturner007(a)ameritech.net>
wrote:
Beware of this one, It's long, and I've spliced
together at least two
(three?) posts, and probably quoted things
out-of-order...
First off, everything seems in order to me... but
thats just me...
[-snip-]
to work, and may not get right? Why make getting
it right harder by
adding a lot of complexity, instead of adding
infrastructure?
good point, that seems like the logical way to
proceed.
I totally agree here, we should always implement
things and get them working properly before we get
them working fast, or else we become like the evil
empire ;)
Also: we could, indeed, implement wine-rpcss as you
mention. Since it's
not properly a "subsystem" in the MS sense of the
term, maybe it's
called "wine-epmap" but that's just semantics...
what you describe is
totally doable, and we could convert from some
low-level kludgy
implementation to an RPC-based implementation once
the necessary
marshalling was in place... I'll give this serious
thought.
ok well if it is doable, i believe we should do it,
why focus on the stuff that is _truely_ hard and that
we may possibly not know jack shit about when we can
get the _easier_ (not necessarily easy) stuff out of
the way first, that will lead to a more solid codebase
with which to work with.
Back to Ove:
[snip]
heh, I know how that goes. Your insights, alone,
are helpful and
appreciated; get well, and we will collaborate on
this when you have
the time to devote to it.
yes please, do get better soon, i may be coming down
with something myself, my friend/roommate's ex may be
the one that gave it to me too :( she is in the
hospital now with an abcess on her tonsils, and i may
have (somehow) gotten something from it, as I now
have
a sore throat...
-Dustin
P.S. nice quote Greg ;)
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/