Nikolay Sivov <nsivov(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
On 5/6/21 5:41 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)codeweavers.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
[...]
That another crash happens at the end of
test_get_ownerDocument() because
priv->properties of doc1 and doc_owner have the same pointer value, and
releasing doc_owner after doc1 leads to a double free and heap corruption.
Nikolay, could you please have a look?
I'm one of the rediscoverers and I
(re)sent a patch:
https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2021-May/186299.html Thanks for
working on this! Still, I'm waiting for a review of this patchset
from the maintainer. Nikolay, could you please either start reviewing assigned
to you patches in a reasonable time frame, or stop pretending to be a maintainer?
First you asked someone else to fix an older problem
No, I didn't ask someone else (who is that by the way?), I went ahead and debuugged
the problem and sent an analysis to the list. Zebediah then replied:
"That's a rather old bug; unfortunately it's been independently
discovered several times by now..."
, that sort of
blocks test results from your own patches, instead of fixing it yourself.
Do you mean that anyone sending patches must fix test failures caused
intermittently by not related things in *existing* tests?
And you while being a manintainer were ignoring this old bug for years
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43377
https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2018-February/123378.html
https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2018-February/123379.html
and now you're demanding me to fix that bug for you? That's rude and
incompentent on your part, to say the least.
Now you're complaining that it didn't happen
fast enough?
Are you really a maintainer, or just pretending to be the one?
--
Dmitry.