On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/26/2012 01:01, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
---
dlls/ole32/filemoniker.c | 44
++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/ole32/filemoniker.c b/dlls/ole32/filemoniker.c
index b3a5cc2..688f6b8 100644
--- a/dlls/ole32/filemoniker.c
+++ b/dlls/ole32/filemoniker.c
@@ -657,6 +657,16 @@ FileMonikerImpl_Reduce(IMoniker* iface, IBindCtx*
pbc, DWORD dwReduceHowFar,
return MK_S_REDUCED_TO_SELF;
}
+static void
+FileMonikerImpl_FreeStringTable(LPOLESTR* stringTable)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i=0; stringTable[i]!=NULL; i++)
+ CoTaskMemFree(stringTable[i]);
+ CoTaskMemFree(stringTable);
+}
+
Could you please adjust a naming for that to something like
free_stringtable() cause it doesn't really access file moniker in this
helper.
OK
Also stringTable[i]!=NULL could be shortened to
stringTable[i].
I know but it's mostly a matter of style. I prefer the '!=
NULL'
notation when accessing it "array-style", and any sane compiler would
optimize it anyway.
CoTaskMemFree(str1);
CoTaskMemFree(str2);
@@ -1004,17 +1010,9 @@ FileMonikerImpl_CommonPrefixWith(IMoniker*
iface,IMoniker* pmkOther,IMoniker** p
{
for(i=0;i<sameIdx;i++)
strcatW(commonPath,stringTable1[i]);
-
- for(i=0;i<nb1;i++)
- CoTaskMemFree(stringTable1[i]);
-
- CoTaskMemFree(stringTable1);
-
- for(i=0;i<nb2;i++)
- CoTaskMemFree(stringTable2[i]);
-
- CoTaskMemFree(stringTable2);
-
+
+ FileMonikerImpl_FreeStringTable(stringTable1);
+ FileMonikerImpl_FreeStringTable(stringTable2);
You sure it's an equivalent change? I mean regarding index boundaries above.
It's equivalent.
Also while you're at it
FileMonikerImpl_DecomposePath() needs to be
properly fixed - it returns HRESULT, not it. And surrounding code relies on
FAILED() mask to get this index boundary from return value, this is really
broken.
Yes, but that probably warrants a patch of its own, to keep this one
as self-contained/atomic as possible.
I'll look into that
Frédéric