can someone run the attached test (which is an evolution of
dlls/kernel/tests/atom.c) on a win9x box and send me back the results...
the semantics for getting an atom name with a buffer too small are so
inconsistent on XP, I'd like to get an idea of what gives on Win9x (and even NT
if there are some takers)
TIA
--
Eric Pouech
Show replies by date