André Hentschel <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> writes:
> when accidently using the wrong path then
> err:msi:MSI_OpenPackageW can't find L"asf.msi"
> is more readable than
> err:msi:copy_package_to_temp failed to copy package L"asf.msi" to L"C:\\users\\dawncrow\\Temp\\msi71e7.tmp" (2)
Then you should fix that function to display a better error, instead of
adding an extra check to every open.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4013
Your paranoid android.
=== W98SE (32 bit class) ===
class.c:932: Test failed: expected ERROR_NOACCESS, got -559038737
=== WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit class) ===
class.c:932: Test failed: expected ERROR_NOACCESS, got -559038737
class.c:937: Test failed: expected ERROR_NOACCESS, got -559038737
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4012
Your paranoid android.
=== W98SE (32 bit ordinal) ===
ordinal.c:616: Test failed: GetShellSecurityDescriptor should fail, got 0096F808
=== WVISTAADM (32 bit ordinal) ===
No test summary line found
=== W7PRO (32 bit ordinal) ===
ordinal.c:1789: Test failed: got 27
ordinal.c:1839: Test failed: got 27
ordinal.c:1847: Test failed: got 27
ordinal.c:1855: Test failed: got 38, length 39
ordinal.c:1866: Test failed: got 41
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit ordinal) ===
ordinal.c:1783: Test failed: got 9
ordinal.c:1789: Test failed: got 26
ordinal.c:1804: Test failed: got 6
ordinal.c:1817: Test failed: got 9
ordinal.c:1825: Test failed: got 9
ordinal.c:1839: Test failed: got 26
ordinal.c:1847: Test failed: got 26
ordinal.c:1877: Test failed: got 19
ordinal.c:1888: Test failed: got 22
=== W7PROX64 (64 bit ordinal) ===
ordinal.c:1783: Test failed: got 9
ordinal.c:1789: Test failed: got 26
ordinal.c:1804: Test failed: got 6
ordinal.c:1817: Test failed: got 9
ordinal.c:1825: Test failed: got 9
ordinal.c:1839: Test failed: got 26
ordinal.c:1847: Test failed: got 26
ordinal.c:1877: Test failed: got 19
ordinal.c:1888: Test failed: got 22
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4011
Your paranoid android.
=== W98SE (32 bit ordinal) ===
ordinal.c:614: Test failed: GetShellSecurityDescriptor should fail, got 0096F808
=== WVISTAADM (32 bit ordinal) ===
No test summary line found
=== W7PRO (32 bit ordinal) ===
ordinal.c:1787: Test failed: got 27
ordinal.c:1837: Test failed: got 27
ordinal.c:1845: Test failed: got 27
ordinal.c:1853: Test failed: got 38, length 39
ordinal.c:1864: Test failed: got 41
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit ordinal) ===
ordinal.c:1781: Test failed: got 9
ordinal.c:1787: Test failed: got 26
ordinal.c:1802: Test failed: got 6
ordinal.c:1815: Test failed: got 9
ordinal.c:1823: Test failed: got 9
ordinal.c:1837: Test failed: got 26
ordinal.c:1845: Test failed: got 26
ordinal.c:1875: Test failed: got 19
ordinal.c:1886: Test failed: got 22
=== W7PROX64 (64 bit ordinal) ===
ordinal.c:1781: Test failed: got 9
ordinal.c:1787: Test failed: got 26
ordinal.c:1802: Test failed: got 6
ordinal.c:1815: Test failed: got 9
ordinal.c:1823: Test failed: got 9
ordinal.c:1837: Test failed: got 26
ordinal.c:1845: Test failed: got 26
ordinal.c:1875: Test failed: got 19
ordinal.c:1886: Test failed: got 22
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Octavian Voicu
<octavian.voicu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Test results from test.winehq.org show that GetMixFormat consistently
> fails on some configurations (usually for both capture and render,
> sometimes only for capture).
I also found out why GetMixFormat fails on my system (Kubuntu 10.04).
OpenAL returns Pulse Audio as the default device, but pulseaudio
daemon is not running (I removed the pulseaudio package from my
system).
MMDevEnum marks the pulseaudio device as the default one (for both
render and capture), but alcOpenDevice / alcCaptureOpenDevice fail so
the device is marked with state DEVICE_STATE_NOTPRESENT and
openal_setformat is never called (which is the function responsible
for writing the DeviceFormat registry key, used by GetMixFormat).
A proper fix for the failed GetMixFormat test would be to fall back
MMDevice_def_play / MMDevice_def_rec to the 2nd, 3rd, etc device from
the default device list, and eventually to the first good device that
is found (if all devices from the default device list fail). Is this
OK?
Octavian
Siggraph happens to be a stone's throw from my house
this year, and one of the presenters was my frosh roommate :-),
so I'm heading over to the opengl BOF to listen in.
( http://www.khronos.org/news/events/detail/siggraph-la-2010/#topengl_bof )
Email me or google chat me if you want me to try to find out anything...
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4009
Your paranoid android.
=== WXPPROSP3 (32 bit uri) ===
uri.c:2169: Test failed: Expected http://google.com:00035 but got L"http://google.com:35" on uri_tests[60].str_props[2].
uri.c:2400: Test failed: Error: Expected http://google.com:00035 but got L"http://google.com:35" on uri_test[60].
uri.c:2856: Test failed: Error: Expected a length of 23 but got 20 on uri_tests[60].str_props[2].
=== WVISTAADM (32 bit uri) ===
uri.c:2169: Test failed: Expected http://google.com:00035 but got L"http://google.com:35" on uri_tests[60].str_props[2].
uri.c:2400: Test failed: Error: Expected http://google.com:00035 but got L"http://google.com:35" on uri_test[60].
uri.c:2856: Test failed: Error: Expected a length of 23 but got 20 on uri_tests[60].str_props[2].
=== W2K8SE (32 bit uri) ===
uri.c:2169: Test failed: Expected http://google.com:00035 but got L"http://google.com:35" on uri_tests[60].str_props[2].
uri.c:2400: Test failed: Error: Expected http://google.com:00035 but got L"http://google.com:35" on uri_test[60].
uri.c:2856: Test failed: Error: Expected a length of 23 but got 20 on uri_tests[60].str_props[2].
On 07/27/2010 10:28 AM, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
>
We now have an error on the translation site as you've merged 'New' and
'Window'.
I know you brought this up on wine-devel but until agreed upon we should
stick to the English one IMHO.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Matt 'Murph' Finnicum
<mattfinn(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> This was causing console spam when I played Starcraft 2 (since
> dwPlatformId was used uninitialized and thus was invalid).
>
>
>
>
Hi Matt,
Your patch causes declarations and code in the ImmGetVirtualKey
function to be mixed, something that's only permitted in C99. Most
likely you'll want to either initialize the size field in the
OSVERSIONINFOA struct declaration or move the statement to an
appropriate place after the declarations.
Andrew