Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12968
Your paranoid android.
=== WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit ie) ===
ie.c:62: Test failed: Could not create InternetExplorer instance: 80040154
ie: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004012F2
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12967
Your paranoid android.
=== WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== WVISTAADM (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W2K8SE (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W7PRO (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== W7PROX64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found
Hi,
there is bug 27908, which i closed as invalid, because user did not
used latest fixed version.
AJ says: If there was a bug then it's FIXED.
Based on that, even if the user has a crash in 1.0.1 and opens _now_
a bug and one day later says "it is FIXED in 1.3.25", then it should
be marked as FIXED.
Because i noticed before, that this is handled differently, i'm
writing here about above rule, which unify that.
Regards,
W.
--
Sháníte letenky na pracovní cestu, dovolenou či jen na výlet? Na
http://letenky.volny.cz si zajisté vyberete.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12934
Your paranoid android.
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit) ===
run.c:177: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.FullName = "
run.c:177: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.Path = "
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12933
Your paranoid android.
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit) ===
run.c:177: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.FullName = "
run.c:177: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.Path = "
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12932
Your paranoid android.
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit) ===
run.c:177: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.FullName = "
run.c:177: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.Path = "
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12931
Your paranoid android.
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit) ===
run.c:177: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.FullName = "
run.c:177: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.Path = "
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12930
Your paranoid android.
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit) ===
run.c:177: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.FullName = "
run.c:177: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.Path = "
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12928
Your paranoid android.
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit) ===
run.c:177: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.FullName = "
run.c:177: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.Path = "
Hi,
I've never seen a documentation of what Wine expects from the ALSA/OSS/CoreAudio device.
- A bare bones "hw:0" device with all its restrictions, e.g. stereo
16bit only? As Wine provides no mixer, this would disallow playing
multiple sounds concurrently (bug #NN) on most current sound cards.
Some people seem to setup Wine via the registry to use that.
- "plug:hw" which can convert 8bit mono to 16bit stereo and provides resampling?
(I forgot about the difference with "plughw")
- The "dmix" device, which only supports a single rate (typically
48000, see /usr/share/alsa/alsa.conf:defaults.pcm.dmix.rate),
accepts only 32bit int(!) samples and restricts #channels like hw:0?
This allows to open multiple devices.
- The "plug:dmix" device, which chains a resampler and converter with
dmix so that it can accept any PCM format?
- "pulse", which like "plug:dmix" accepts any PCM format?
- "default", which presumably maps to either plug:dmix or pulse so as
to accept any PCM format and open multiple devices?
It seems obvious Wine needs something as flexible as "pulse" or
"plug:dmix" (pure "dmix" won't fit because Wine and apps don't cope
well with the 32 bits samples requirement).
Does mmdevapi change the equation, happy with
dmix instead of plug:dmix as long as both rates are the same?
Given that, can't Wine delegate more to the OS? It seems quite stupid to e.g. write a
resampler for Wine when ALSA and MacOS' Coreaudio already include one.
(On MacOS, couldn't mmdevapi map more to MacOS' audio filter chains?)
What's the point of Winealsa's mmdevapi code iterating through ALSA's hw:N devices?
IMHO only CoreAudio EXCLUSIVE mode can make use of them. It's a no-no for SHAREDMODE.
Or is the plan to be really happy with exclusive access to hw:0 (preventing non Wine
apps from doing audio!?!) and implement in Wine's mmdevapi a true mixer as well as
a high quality resampler for SHAREDMODE with RATEADJUST and WINMM needs?
Who can shed some light?
Regards,
Jörg Höhle