wine-devel July 2011

69 participants
221 discussions

Re: [8/9] winhttp: Implement IWinHttpRequest::SetRequestHeader.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12827 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

12 years, 9 months

Re: [7/9] winhttp: Implement IWinHttpRequest::GetResponseHeader.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12826 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

12 years, 9 months

Re: [6/9] winhttp: Add some parameter checks.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12824 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

12 years, 9 months

Re: [1/9] winhttp: Implement IWinHttpRequest::SetProxy.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12823 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

12 years, 9 months

Re: msvcrt/tests: remove unused assignments (LLVM/Clang)

by Frédéric Delanoy

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 03:48, Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote: > -- > -Austin Already sent similar patches. Not sure AJ likes those.

12 years, 9 months

Re: cmd: mkdir should complain if directory already exists (try 2)

by Frédéric Delanoy

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 07:39, Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> wrote: > Changes since last try: > - fix remaining todo_wine's > - add one more testcase for invalid paths (one that doesn't trigger > help message) > - simplified create_full_path > - avoid generating error message in race case where somebody else > creates an intermediate directory first Maybe a bit nitpickings, but echo mkdir foo slash star errorlevel %ErrorLevel% could be more readable with echo mkdir foo/* errorlevel %ErrorLevel% / and * are not to be escaped, so don't mind expanding them "litteraly" Frédéric

12 years, 9 months

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ntdll: implement the NamedPipeConfiguration value for the FilePipeLocalInformation class of NtQueryInformati

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12805 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit pipe) === No test summary line found

12 years, 9 months

Re: [PATCH 2/4] kernel32, ntdll, server: implement permission checks for named pipes

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12804 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit pipe) === No test summary line found

12 years, 9 months

Re: [PATCH 1/4] server, ntdll: get rid of the blocking parameter for ioctls. blockingness depends on the overlapped flag for

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12803 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit pipe) === No test summary line found

12 years, 9 months

Questions on WINE releases and stability

by louis＠museresearch.com

Hi, I am a developer for a product which makes heavy use of WINE. Right now, we're deciding which newer version of WINE to go to, and I thought the wine-devel community might have some insight. I did read the WineReleaseCriteria entry on the wiki, but still have some questions. If anyone could answer some things that I've been wondering about, it would go a long way towards helping us make an informed decision. So, here goes: - Does the development branch of WINE go through a battery of tests before it is posted? What kind of criteria has to be met before a development release is made available on the main page? - It's my understanding that the stable branch only has select features and patches ported over (from the wiki: "..with only minimal changes merged in"). Would this mean that if I compared a stable release with a development release from around the same time that the two releases would have significant differences? Specifically, I'm wondering about 1.2.3 vs. 1.3.15. - Is 64-bit support in version 1.2.3 generally usable and stable, or is the current development release a lot more mature in that respect? Your expertise would be appreciated! Louis

12 years, 9 months

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
23
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel July 2011